Skip to content

Conversation

@scottaohara
Copy link
Member

@scottaohara scottaohara commented Mar 26, 2025

closes #546

@pkra - I've revised the note. based on your latest github comment, it still seems a warning is in order. using dpub for standard web dev is not the intent of dpub aria, after all. if it was, then then the features would be in ARIA proper :)

please let me know if there are any further changes you'd like to see with this note or make any suggested edits you think would make it better.

thanks for calling this out and doing some testing.


Preview | Diff

closes #546

@pkra - I've revised the note.  based on your latest github comment, it still seems a warning is in order.  using dpub for standard web dev is not the intent of dpub aria, after all.  if it was, then then the features would be in ARIA proper :)

please let me know if there are any further changes you'd like to see with this note or make any suggested edits you think would make it better.

thanks for calling this out and doing some testing.
@scottaohara scottaohara added the editorial non-normative updates label Mar 26, 2025
@pkra
Copy link
Member

pkra commented Mar 27, 2025

Thank you, Scott!

@scottaohara scottaohara merged commit 2493015 into gh-pages Apr 9, 2025
2 checks passed
@scottaohara scottaohara deleted the issue546 branch April 9, 2025 13:06
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

editorial non-normative updates

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

is the note warning of DPUB implementations still accurate?

3 participants