Skip to content

Issues: w3c/process

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Clear current search query, filters, and sorts
11 Open 2 Closed
11 Open 2 Closed
Author
Filter by author
Loading
Label
Filter by label
Loading
Use alt + click/return to exclude labels
or ⇧ + click/return for logical OR
Projects
Filter by project
Loading
Milestones
Filter by milestone
Loading
Assignee
Filter by who’s assigned
Sort
Sort by
Newest Oldest Most commented Least commented Recently updated Least recently updated Best match
Most reactions
👍 👎 😄 🎉 😕 ❤️ 🚀 👀

Issues list

Facilitator not explicitly chair Agenda+ Marks issues that are ready for discussion on the call
#1002 opened Mar 12, 2025 by frivoal Loading…
2
Drop wide review of charters from the Process Agenda+ Marks issues that are ready for discussion on the call
#1001 opened Mar 12, 2025 by frivoal Loading…
6
Move details of how the Team evaluates charters to the guide Agenda+ Marks issues that are ready for discussion on the call
#1000 opened Mar 12, 2025 by frivoal Loading…
3
Drop unnecessary detail Agenda+ Marks issues that are ready for discussion on the call
#999 opened Mar 12, 2025 by frivoal Loading…
3
Drop unnecessary remarks about optional communication Agenda+ Marks issues that are ready for discussion on the call
#998 opened Mar 12, 2025 by frivoal Loading…
2
Allow Team to step in when consensus cannot be found during Charter Refinement. Agenda+ Marks issues that are ready for discussion on the call
#997 opened Mar 11, 2025 by fantasai Loading…
2
Feedback on Charter refinement draft text Agenda+ Marks issues that are ready for discussion on the call P2025 candidate To be addressed for Process 2025 (suggestion) Type: Question
#934 opened Oct 21, 2024 by caribouW3
7
Glossaries: a different pattern needed? Agenda+ Marks issues that are ready for discussion on the call
#904 opened Jul 31, 2024 by cwilso
4
Note that “Candidate” means “eligible” for further-advancement consideration Agenda+ Marks issues that are ready for discussion on the call
#895 opened Jun 24, 2024 by sideshowbarker Loading…
1
3
Add back language about substantive changes invalidating previous review Agenda+ Marks issues that are ready for discussion on the call
#887 opened Jun 18, 2024 by sideshowbarker Loading…
4
Link for "W3C Horizontal Groups" doesn't describe W3C horizontal groups Agenda+ Marks issues that are ready for discussion on the call Needs proposed PR Needs Team Feedback Type: Editorial improvements
#769 opened Jun 15, 2023 by jyasskin
@plehegar
3
ProTip! Type g i on any issue or pull request to go back to the issue listing page.