Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Accept unknown datatypes #141

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Jan 23, 2025
Merged

Accept unknown datatypes #141

Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
2 commits
Select commit Hold shift + click to select a range
85b4f27
Accept unknown datatypes
afs Jan 19, 2025
f12d412
Restore SHOULD NOT from RDF 1.1
afs Jan 19, 2025
File filter

Filter by extension

Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
8 changes: 5 additions & 3 deletions spec/index.html
View file
Open in desktop
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -764,7 +764,9 @@ <h3>Literals</h3>
</li>
<li>If the literal's <a>datatype IRI</a> is <em>not</em>
handled by an RDF implementation, then the literal value is
not defined by this specification.</li>
not defined by this specification. Implementations SHOULD accept
literals with unknown datatype IRIs and produce RDF graphs from them.
</li>
</ul>

<p><dfn data-local-lt="term-equal">Literal term equality</dfn>:
Expand Down Expand Up @@ -1327,8 +1329,8 @@ <h3>Datatype IRIs</h3>
Any literal typed with a datatype not handled by an RDF implementation
is treated just like an unknown IRI, i.e., as referring to an unknown thing.
Applications MAY give a warning message if they are unable to determine the
referent of an IRI used in a typed literal. RDF implementations SHOULD
not reject a literal with an unknown datatype as either a syntactic or
referent of an IRI used in a typed literal. RDF implementations SHOULD NOT
reject a literal with an unknown datatype as either a syntactic or
semantic error.<p>

<p>Other specifications MAY impose additional constraints on
Expand Down
Loading