Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

update RDF dataset discussion with explicit comparison of { RDF | SPARQL } { 1.2 | 1.1 | 1.0 } #151

Open
wants to merge 3 commits into
base: main
Choose a base branch
from
Open
Changes from 1 commit
Commits
File filter

Filter by extension

Filter by extension

Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
6 changes: 4 additions & 2 deletions spec/index.html
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -1021,11 +1021,13 @@ <h2>RDF Datasets</h2>
can avoid interoperability issues by not ascribing importance to
the presence or absence of empty named graphs.</p>

<p>SPARQL 1.2 [[SPARQL12-QUERY]] uses
<p>Version 1.2 of the SPARQL Query Language [[SPARQL12-QUERY]] uses
<a data-cite="SPARQL12-QUERY#sparqlDataset">the same concept of an RDF Dataset</a>
as RDF versions 1.1 and 1.2,
in which the graph names of named graphs may be IRIs or blank nodes.
In contrast, version 1.1 of the SPARQL Query Language [[SPARQL11-QUERY]]
only allows IRIs as graph names.</p>
and RDF version 1.0
only allowed graph names to be IRIs.</p>

</div>

Expand Down
Loading