Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Reorders definitions in RDF-concepts, and add definitions for 'ground' and 'atomic' #173

Open
wants to merge 4 commits into
base: main
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

pchampin
Copy link
Contributor

@pchampin pchampin commented Mar 21, 2025

I slightly reworded it to avoid a forward-reference to 'triple term'.
It does not cite the notion of RDF Term, and it balances 3.1 and 3.2 better
(considering that we will add more definitions in 3.2)
@pchampin pchampin requested review from hartig, afs and gkellogg and removed request for hartig March 21, 2025 17:08
@@ -615,6 +620,10 @@ <h3>RDF Terms</h3>
<a>blank nodes</a>, and <a>triple terms</a> are collectively known as
<span id="dfn-rdf-terms"><!-- obsolete term--></span><dfn data-lt="rdf term">RDF terms</dfn>.</p>

<p>
[=IRIs=], [=literals=] and [=blank nodes=] are said to be <dfn data-lt-no-plural>atomic</dfn> [=RDF terms=].
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Wrt. "atomic", see discussion in #172. (I'm all for the rest of this PR.)

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants