Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
WCAG2ICT Task Force request to Update non-web-ict.md #1197
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
base: main
Are you sure you want to change the base?
WCAG2ICT Task Force request to Update non-web-ict.md #1197
Changes from all commits
d4e4930
f614ca9
676e18b
e01e7e8
cf7bb91
1e4465a
a5390bb
96e7266
875658f
fb11180
1561c19
00ba8e1
000685a
7f7fcdb
61e72bb
5ecd2b6
adc5086
5a2b344
1b98cfa
ea705b8
51504a8
bd94a86
66e61b8
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Jump to
There are no files selected for viewing
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Not sure if linking to WCAG's definition of normative and informative is a good idea. We should think about how much we want to link to other places. This is a potential distraction for readers. Aren't normative and informative self-explanatory in this context?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I think this was something that the link was in the WCAG2ICT Note and when I copied in the text, and the link remained. However, there are those of us that work in the standards world and we know what normative vs. informative is. Not sure policy makers and others who are new to reading standards know the distinction. I don't think having a link is harmful here, and would prefer it be kept..
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Task Force discussed, we want to keep these links. Closed without action.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
@ChrisLoiselle
Thanks. I understand TF rationale. I'd like to leave this open in case this serves as guidance for other WAI Staff that will review this.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
W3C has traditionally avoided "policy makers" as an audience. Could we do with "regulators" as a broader term? Applies to subsequent appearances of the word.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
@ChrisLoiselle
Thanks. I understand TF rationale. I'd like to leave this open in case this serves as guidance for other WAI Staff that will review this.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Traditionally, we have avoided having all these pointers to external resources on the overview pages. I think these belong more on the Note itself. I presume this is one thing that other WAI Staff may have comments on. Would we be OK moving these to the document itself (some of them are already there) and pointing to that section if we want to explicitly call them out in here.