Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Updating example 2 in prog determined #3049

Closed
wants to merge 1 commit into from
Closed

Updating example 2 in prog determined #3049

Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
1 commit
Select commit
File filter

Filter by extension

Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
3 changes: 1 addition & 2 deletions guidelines/terms/20/programmatically-determined.html
View file
Open in desktop
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -6,8 +6,7 @@
<a>user agents</a>, including <a>assistive technologies</a>, can extract and present this information to users in different modalities
</p>

<aside class="example"><p>Determined in a markup language from elements and attributes that are accessed directly
by commonly available assistive technology.
<aside class="example"><p>Determined in a markup language from elements and attributes that are exposed in the accessibility tree.
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Suggested change
<aside class="example"><p>Determined in a markup language from elements and attributes that are exposed in the accessibility tree.
<aside class="example"><p>Determined in a markup language from elements and attributes that are accessed via the accessibility tree by commonly available assistive technology.

As I mentioned in a comment today, I'd prefer to keep "commonly available assistive technology" in both examples, consistent with 5.2.4 and "accessibility supported."

Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

i'd keep the aspect of whether something is in the accessibility tree, and whether or not AT then accesses/uses it for anything, separate

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I prefer 'exposed', as it is rather about clean html instead of depending on abilities of existing technologies.

</p></aside>

<aside class="example"><p>Determined from technology-specific data structures in a non-markup language and exposed
Expand Down