-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 280
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Improve wording of first example for path-based gesture #4268
base: main
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Conversation
Under Intent, we currently have: > A **path-based gesture** involves an interaction where not just the endpoints matter, but how the pointer moves between these points. > > If the gesture is only recognised if the user moves in a (mostly) straight line from the start point to the end point, it is an example of a path-based gesture. That second sentence is confusing. It is an example of a common characteristic of some path-based gestures. First example of path-based gesture If the gesture is only recognised if the user moves in a (mostly) straight line from the start point to the end point, it is an example of a path-based gesture.
✅ Deploy Preview for wcag2 ready!
To edit notification comments on pull requests, go to your Netlify site configuration. |
FWIW, this came up in the context of WCAG 3 complex pointer inputs drafting. We were looking for a definition of simple pointer inputs. We used single-pointer as part of our draft glossary when we noticed single pointer input is currently just a place-holder with the WCAG 3 editors draft. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
This looks good to me
incidentally, I'm glad to see that WCAG 3 is defining the proper "single pointer input" rather than just "single pointer" ... this had been a blunder in WCAG 2 at the time (which is what caused the various contortions to address this/clarify this somehow - #3536 and #4070) |
Discussed briefly on Backlog call 3/7. Agreement that there is some grammar error, but maybe could be improved. |
Under Intent, we currently have:
That second sentence is confusing. It is an example of a common characteristic of some path-based gestures. I propose replacing it with: