Add missing related technique SCR39 to F95 (and vice-versa)

[venkatvemuri28]

Bug Summary

• Missing related technique reference SCR39 in F95 failure technique

---

Root Cause Analysis

• Not updated in F95.html Related Techniques section
• Closes #3789

---

Fix Details

• Replaced placeholder in techniques/failures/F95.html

---

Risk / Impact Areas

• Minimal risk: single file update
• Affects only navigation to related technique
• No impact on site functionality or other techniques

---

Checklist

• I tested this across supported browsers/devices
• No console errors or warnings

---

Reviewer Notes

• Verify link resolves correctly in built site
• Check consistency with other technique links (e.g., .html extension)

[netlify]

✅ Deploy Preview for wcag2 ready!

Name	Link
🔨 Latest commit	7cfa609
🔍 Latest deploy log	https://app.netlify.com/projects/wcag2/deploys/69ab33a2cbb9c60008bd224d
😎 Deploy Preview	https://deploy-preview-4883--wcag2.netlify.app
📱 Preview on mobile	Toggle QR Code... Use your smartphone camera to open QR code link.

---

To edit notification comments on pull requests, go to your Netlify project configuration.

[venkatvemuri28]

@umut-gultekin Please take a look at the fix.

[umut-gultekin]

@umut-gultekin Please take a look at the fix.

I think the path needs to be
../../client-side-script/SCR39.html

[venkatvemuri28]

@umut-gultekin Please take a look at the fix.

I think the path needs to be ../../client-side-script/SCR39.html

It doesnt.

I tested its works. Please try at the following deploy link.

https://deploy-preview-4883--wcag2.netlify.app/techniques/failures/f95

[venkatvemuri28]

@umut-gultekin @patrickhlauke, could you please let me know if there are any outstanding items pending for the approval and merging of this request?

[patrickhlauke]

@venkatvemuri28 as you probably saw on friday's call, we work our way through items that are in drafted at the task force meetings. your item is in drafted, so we'll get to it :)

[venkatvemuri28]

@venkatvemuri28 as you probably saw on friday's call, we work our way through items that are in drafted at the task force meetings. your item is in drafted, so we'll get to it :)

Thank you for the clarification :)

[patrickhlauke]

question for TF as we review: should this linking be reciprocal? i.e. do we also need SCR39 to link back to F95 as related technique

[patrickhlauke]

discussed at the TF meeting today. one minor thing: if we could add the reciprocal link from SCR39 linking back to F95 as well, then happy to send over to WG

[patrickhlauke]

@venkatvemuri28 I added the reciprocal link, since I was already looking at some other stuff. So this is all good to be sent to WG

[venkatvemuri28]

discussed at the TF meeting today. one minor thing: if we could add the reciprocal link from SCR39 linking back to F95 as well, then happy to send over to WG

thank you!!