-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 2.2k
RFP Proposal: TxShield - Transaction Safety Simulator #2538
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Conversation
CLA Assistant Lite bot All contributors have signed the CLA ✍️ ✅ |
I have read and hereby sign the Contributor License Agreement. |
how this will be useful for substrate based chains? like polkadot? I didn't see anything around this. |
Yes! TxShield already connects to Polkadot wallets and simulates transactions. Today it checks basic risks. By Milestone 3, we'll add Polkadot-specific scam protection (like XCM risks). |
Yes! TxShield already connects to Polkadot wallets and simulates
transactions. Today it checks basic risks. By Milestone 3, we'll add
Polkadot-specific scam protection (like XCM risks).
…On Thu, Apr 10, 2025 at 1:15 PM muddlebee ***@***.***> wrote:
how this will be useful for substrate based chains? like polkadot? I
didn't see anything around this.
—
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub
<#2538 (comment)>,
or unsubscribe
<https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/A6KUTMHTDLUOOGAFIVUVZFL2YYSBJAVCNFSM6AAAAAB2YRB43KVHI2DSMVQWIX3LMV43OSLTON2WKQ3PNVWWK3TUHMZDOOJRHEZTOMJZG4>
.
You are receiving this because you authored the thread.Message ID:
***@***.***>
*muddlebee* left a comment (w3f/Grants-Program#2538)
<#2538 (comment)>
how this will be useful for substrate based chains? like polkadot? I
didn't see anything around this.
—
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub
<#2538 (comment)>,
or unsubscribe
<https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/A6KUTMHTDLUOOGAFIVUVZFL2YYSBJAVCNFSM6AAAAAB2YRB43KVHI2DSMVQWIX3LMV43OSLTON2WKQ3PNVWWK3TUHMZDOOJRHEZTOMJZG4>
.
You are receiving this because you authored the thread.Message ID:
***@***.***>
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Hey @HoodClock, thanks for the PR. It looks like you are trying to apply for a grant, not submit an RFP. For this, we have a different template and process, see https://grants.web3.foundation/docs/Process/how-to-apply#how-to-apply
Thank you for the clarification.
I deleted the previous RFP file, submit a proper grant application in
application/TxShield.md with the PR number (#2541).
Appreciate your help,
…On Fri, Apr 11, 2025 at 5:09 PM Sebastian Müller ***@***.***> wrote:
***@***.**** requested changes on this pull request.
Hey @HoodClock <https://github.com/HoodClock>, thanks for the PR. It
looks like you are trying to apply for a grant, not submit an RFP. For
this, we have a different template and process, see
https://grants.web3.foundation/docs/Process/how-to-apply#how-to-apply
—
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub
<#2538 (review)>,
or unsubscribe
<https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/A6KUTMCMXQA3OUUBVNI6G732Y6WHVAVCNFSM6AAAAAB2YRB43KVHI2DSMVQWIX3LMV43YUDVNRWFEZLROVSXG5CSMV3GSZLXHMZDONRQGE2TSNJUG4>
.
You are receiving this because you were mentioned.Message ID:
***@***.***>
|
Thanks |
RFP Proposal: TxShield - Transaction Safety Simulator
Link to RFP: https://github.com/HoodClock/Grants-Program/blob/master/docs/RFPs/TxShield.md
Summary: TxShield simulates transactions, estimates gas, and flags honeypot scams to protect Web3 users, targeting a 6-month beta launch with $45K funding.