-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 924
tests: list known failing tests #6029
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
base: main
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Conversation
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Pull request overview
This PR updates the test ignores file to document known failing tests by adding issue references and new test exclusions.
- Adds 8 new SIMD test ignores for LLVM+loongarch64 architecture related to issue #6017
- Reformats multi-value test ignores section with proper issue reference #5943 and standardized formatting
- Adds new multi-value test ignores for llvm+loongarch64 and llvm+riscv64 platforms
💡 Add Copilot custom instructions for smarter, more guided reviews. Learn how to get started.
| llvm+loongarch64 spec::simd::simd_f32x4::llvm::llvm | ||
| llvm+loongarch64 spec::simd::simd_f64x2::llvm::llvm | ||
| llvm+loongarch64 spec::simd::simd_load::llvm::llvm | ||
| llvm+loongarch64 spec::simd::simd_splat::llvm::llvm | ||
| llvm+loongarch64 spec::simd_f32x4::llvm::llvm | ||
| llvm+loongarch64 spec::simd_f64x2::llvm::llvm | ||
| llvm+loongarch64 spec::simd_load::llvm::llvm | ||
| llvm+loongarch64 spec::simd_splat::llvm::llvm |
Copilot
AI
Jan 9, 2026
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
The test paths use "::llvm::llvm" as the suffix, but all other similar test entries in this file use "::llvm::universal" as the suffix (see lines 43-58 for riscv64 and lines 69-84 for loongarch64). This inconsistency may indicate an error in the test path specification. Consider changing "::llvm::llvm" to "::llvm::universal" to match the established pattern.
| llvm+loongarch64 spec::simd::simd_f32x4::llvm::llvm | |
| llvm+loongarch64 spec::simd::simd_f64x2::llvm::llvm | |
| llvm+loongarch64 spec::simd::simd_load::llvm::llvm | |
| llvm+loongarch64 spec::simd::simd_splat::llvm::llvm | |
| llvm+loongarch64 spec::simd_f32x4::llvm::llvm | |
| llvm+loongarch64 spec::simd_f64x2::llvm::llvm | |
| llvm+loongarch64 spec::simd_load::llvm::llvm | |
| llvm+loongarch64 spec::simd_splat::llvm::llvm | |
| llvm+loongarch64 spec::simd::simd_f32x4::llvm::universal | |
| llvm+loongarch64 spec::simd::simd_f64x2::llvm::universal | |
| llvm+loongarch64 spec::simd::simd_load::llvm::universal | |
| llvm+loongarch64 spec::simd::simd_splat::llvm::universal | |
| llvm+loongarch64 spec::simd_f32x4::llvm::universal | |
| llvm+loongarch64 spec::simd_f64x2::llvm::universal | |
| llvm+loongarch64 spec::simd_load::llvm::universal | |
| llvm+loongarch64 spec::simd_splat::llvm::universal |
| llvm+loongarch64 spec::simd_f32x4::llvm::llvm | ||
| llvm+loongarch64 spec::simd_f64x2::llvm::llvm | ||
| llvm+loongarch64 spec::simd_load::llvm::llvm | ||
| llvm+loongarch64 spec::simd_splat::llvm::llvm |
Copilot
AI
Jan 9, 2026
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
These test entries (lines 91-94) appear to duplicate the tests from lines 87-90, but with different path prefixes. Lines 87-90 use "spec::simd::simd_" while lines 91-94 use "spec::simd_". If these are indeed the same tests, the duplicates should be removed. If they represent different test paths, please verify that both path patterns are correct and necessary.
| llvm+loongarch64 spec::simd_f32x4::llvm::llvm | |
| llvm+loongarch64 spec::simd_f64x2::llvm::llvm | |
| llvm+loongarch64 spec::simd_load::llvm::llvm | |
| llvm+loongarch64 spec::simd_splat::llvm::llvm |
No description provided.