fix(core): reject negative DeepSeek coordinates - #3067
Open
linhongyu510 wants to merge 1 commit into
Open
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Summary
Problem
The DeepSeek coordinate parser previously extracted values with
/\d+/g. As a result, a model response such as[-10, 500]was silently interpreted as[10, 500], allowing malformed grounding output to become a valid click coordinate.The same issue affected bbox responses: a negative edge could lose its sign before the shared coordinate-range validation saw it.
Changes
The parser now preserves an optional sign while extracting integer values and rejects any negative coordinate before returning normalized values. Existing support for bracket variants and flexible separators is unchanged.
Regression tests cover negative values in both point positions and all four bbox positions.
Validation