feat(cache): port webpack persistent module cache

[hardfist]

Summary

• port webpack's persistent Compilation/modules cache under experiments.newCache.module
• restore and validate cached NormalModule builds while refreshing factory-derived state
• preserve the existing incremental make fast path

Limitations

• only NormalModule is cached; context and other module types are rebuilt because process-local factory state cannot be restored safely yet
• the module cache is disabled for incremental rebuilds and module-executor compilations
• snapshot validation currently uses the timestamp strategy because Rspack does not expose webpack's snapshot.module strategy yet
• Rspack serializes BuildResult instead of Module due to module-graph ownership differences; non-serializable entries are skipped

Follow-up to #15374.

[github-actions]

📦 Binary Size-limit

Comparing 5eda27a to fix(core): align module need_build and FileSystemInfo with webpack (#15374) by hardfist

❌ Size increased by 52.00KB from 68.30MB to 68.35MB (⬆️0.07%)

[codspeed-hq]

Merging this PR will degrade performance by 3.71%

⚠️ Different runtime environments detected

Some benchmarks with significant performance changes were compared across different runtime environments,
which may affect the accuracy of the results.

Open the report in CodSpeed to investigate

❌ 1 regressed benchmark
✅ 49 untouched benchmarks
⏩ 47 skipped benchmarks¹

Warning

Please fix the performance issues or acknowledge them on CodSpeed.

Performance Changes

	Mode	Benchmark	BASE	HEAD	Efficiency
❌	Simulation	rust@create_module_hashes	8.3 ms	8.6 ms	-3.71%

Tip

Investigate this regression by commenting @codspeedbot fix this regression on this PR, or directly use the CodSpeed MCP with your agent.

---

_{Comparing codex/port-webpack-module-caches (5eda27a) with main (a338733)}

Footnotes

1. 47 benchmarks were skipped, so the baseline results were used instead. If they were deleted from the codebase, click here and archive them to remove them from the performance reports. ↩

[github-actions]

Rsdoctor Bundle Diff Analysis

Found 5 projects in monorepo, 5 projects with changes.

📊 Quick Summary

Project	Total Size	Gzip Size	Change	Gzip Change
popular-libs	1.7 MB	556.5 KB	-	-
react-10k	5.6 MB	1.3 MB	-	-
react-1k	823.1 KB	218.4 KB	-	-
ui-components	4.9 MB	1.4 MB	-	-
react-5k	2.7 MB	669.3 KB	-	-

📋 Detailed Reports (Click to expand)

📁 popular-libs

Path: ../build-tools-performance/cases/popular-libs/dist/rsdoctor-data.json

⚠️ No baseline data found - Unable to perform comparison analysis

Metric	Current	Baseline	Change
📊 Total Size	1.7 MB	-	-
🗜️ Gzip Size	556.5 KB	-	-
📄 JavaScript	1.7 MB	-	-
🎨 CSS	0 B	-	-
🌐 HTML	289.0 B	-	-
📁 Other Assets	0 B	-	-

📁 react-10k

Path: ../build-tools-performance/cases/react-10k/dist/rsdoctor-data.json

⚠️ No baseline data found - Unable to perform comparison analysis

Metric	Current	Baseline	Change
📊 Total Size	5.6 MB	-	-
🗜️ Gzip Size	1.3 MB	-	-
📄 JavaScript	5.6 MB	-	-
🎨 CSS	21.0 B	-	-
🌐 HTML	328.0 B	-	-
📁 Other Assets	0 B	-	-

📁 react-1k

Path: ../build-tools-performance/cases/react-1k/dist/rsdoctor-data.json

⚠️ No baseline data found - Unable to perform comparison analysis

Metric	Current	Baseline	Change
📊 Total Size	823.1 KB	-	-
🗜️ Gzip Size	218.4 KB	-	-
📄 JavaScript	822.7 KB	-	-
🎨 CSS	0 B	-	-
🌐 HTML	328.0 B	-	-
📁 Other Assets	0 B	-	-

📁 ui-components

Path: ../build-tools-performance/cases/ui-components/dist/rsdoctor-data.json

⚠️ No baseline data found - Unable to perform comparison analysis

Metric	Current	Baseline	Change
📊 Total Size	4.9 MB	-	-
🗜️ Gzip Size	1.4 MB	-	-
📄 JavaScript	4.8 MB	-	-
🎨 CSS	112.5 KB	-	-
🌐 HTML	328.0 B	-	-
📁 Other Assets	0 B	-	-

📁 react-5k

Path: ../build-tools-performance/cases/react-5k/dist/rsdoctor-data.json

⚠️ No baseline data found - Unable to perform comparison analysis

Metric	Current	Baseline	Change
📊 Total Size	2.7 MB	-	-
🗜️ Gzip Size	669.3 KB	-	-
📄 JavaScript	2.7 MB	-	-
🎨 CSS	21.0 B	-	-
🌐 HTML	328.0 B	-	-
📁 Other Assets	0 B	-	-

Generated by Rsdoctor GitHub Action

[hardfist]

@codex review

[chatgpt-codex-connector]

💡 Codex Review

Here are some automated review suggestions for this pull request.

Reviewed commit: 727ff0de33

ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub

Your team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you

• Open a pull request for review
• Mark a draft as ready
• Comment "@codex review".

If Codex has suggestions, it will comment; otherwise it will react with 👍.

Codex can also answer questions or update the PR. Try commenting "@codex address that feedback".