Skip to content

Manual: macro terminology - #2011

Open
jorisdral wants to merge 1 commit into
mainfrom
jdral/macro-terminology
Open

Manual: macro terminology#2011
jorisdral wants to merge 1 commit into
mainfrom
jdral/macro-terminology

Conversation

@jorisdral

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

A first foray into recording terminology related to macros (and reparsing).

@jorisdral jorisdral self-assigned this May 26, 2026
@jorisdral
jorisdral requested review from dschrempf and edsko May 26, 2026 08:59
Comment thread manual/low-level/terminology.md Outdated
Comment thread manual/low-level/terminology.md Outdated
Comment thread manual/low-level/terminology.md Outdated
Comment thread manual/low-level/terminology.md Outdated
Comment thread manual/low-level/terminology.md Outdated
@jorisdral
jorisdral force-pushed the jdral/macro-terminology branch 2 times, most recently from d1b17a3 to b228ef9 Compare May 28, 2026 12:48
@TravisCardwell

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

(At @edsko's request,) I moved the terminology page to the top, not specific to low-level bindings. I did not make any changes to the content of the file, so it should be trivial to resolve the merge conflict. 🙇

    A first foray into recording terminology related to macros (and reparsing).
@jorisdral
jorisdral force-pushed the jdral/macro-terminology branch from b228ef9 to 2886b94 Compare June 1, 2026 08:16
@jorisdral

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member Author

@dschrempf is this PR still in sync with the macro terminology you've been using? If not, do you have suggestions for updates?

@dschrempf

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

I think, in general, yes.

I didn't use the words "Object-like macro" "Parsable macro", and "Macro invocation". Out of the top of my head, I think sometimes I used "Macro declaration" instead of "Macro definition". The difference between declaration and definition is blurred, in my opinion; and we use declaration much more often than definition, I feel.

@edsko edsko mentioned this pull request Jul 29, 2026
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants