-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 37
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
PR: #39: draft of local config #43
base: master
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Conversation
As discussed elsewhere, I think if we augment ansible.cfg with an [ansible-review] section, that should be relatively flexible. |
Ack, will adjust.
…On Jan 25, 2018 12:08, "Will Thames" ***@***.***> wrote:
As discussed elsewhere, I think if we augment ansible.cfg with an
[ansible-review] section, that should be relatively flexible.
—
You are receiving this because you authored the thread.
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub
<#43 (comment)>,
or mute the thread
<https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AHAVbeTBxQMmh6TJSgdmBhZsjIydKVKUks5tOGCqgaJpZM4RpdPT>
.
|
I actually created an I realise you're likely long since past caring - I hope you are well though! |
Hi :) doing fine I actually still do care, it just possible got off my radar. |
I was thinking of how to implement this and started with smthing like.
36 local_config = os.path.join(os.getcwd(), '.ansible-review', 'config.ini')$ |
I think the PR as it stands looks pretty good. I'd just like to test it - I'll try and do that next week |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Tested this locally and works, but why must we have a folder .ansible-review
? I understand we can put the lint rules in the folder too, but can we also allow the config file to be .ansible-review
with a folder at all? I prefer not having my rules inside each repo... otherwise I have to update the rules in all of my ansible repos one at a time.
this is proposal for #39