-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 1.9k
Semantic matching basics #4788 #4793
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
base: master
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Conversation
d4vidi
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
- Definitely need to add some e2e tests coverage
- 2 big questions to answer before we can move fwd with impl and fixing stuff here
* moved semanticTypes.js to src/matchers/ * changed invoker from type(x) to semanticType(x) * re-indexed some of the classes with its matching semantic types (eg. added RCTTouchable...) * unit test updates
noomorph
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Last but not least, the unit tests seem a bit weird at times.
I attribute this expect(...).not.toThrow() style to some existing precedents in the codebase, but still it won't hurt to think once again what we want actually to test there and whether we test everything that really matters there.
|
This pull request has been automatically marked as stale because it has not had recent activity. It will be closed if no further activity occurs. |
Description
In this pull request, I have …