Skip to content

Remove Portico route (ETH, wstETH, UDST Bridge) #3384

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Draft
wants to merge 1 commit into
base: development
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

kev1n-peters
Copy link
Contributor

No description provided.

Copy link

netlify bot commented Mar 26, 2025

Deploy Preview for wormhole-connect-mainnet ready!

Name Link
🔨 Latest commit 6321c3f
🔍 Latest deploy log https://app.netlify.com/sites/wormhole-connect-mainnet/deploys/67e42e50a9b75800081d9b69
😎 Deploy Preview https://deploy-preview-3384--wormhole-connect-mainnet.netlify.app
📱 Preview on mobile
Toggle QR Code...

QR Code

Use your smartphone camera to open QR code link.

To edit notification comments on pull requests, go to your Netlify site configuration.

Copy link

netlify bot commented Mar 26, 2025

Deploy Preview for wormhole-connect ready!

Name Link
🔨 Latest commit 6321c3f
🔍 Latest deploy log https://app.netlify.com/sites/wormhole-connect/deploys/67e42e50a2a2b900086478dd
😎 Deploy Preview https://deploy-preview-3384--wormhole-connect.netlify.app
📱 Preview on mobile
Toggle QR Code...

QR Code

Use your smartphone camera to open QR code link.

To edit notification comments on pull requests, go to your Netlify site configuration.

@kev1n-peters kev1n-peters force-pushed the remote-portico-route branch from fe61c40 to eab1da3 Compare March 26, 2025 16:35
// Parser for Portico transactions (appId === ETH_BRIDGE or USDT_BRIDGE)
// IMPORTANT: This is where we can add any customizations specific to Portico data
// that we have retrieved from WHScan API
const parsePorticoTx = useCallback(
Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

We will stop showing portico route but if we remove the parsing it won't show previously created txs as well. Is that ok?

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I don't have a strong opinion on this. I guess a benefit of removing it is less code. But obviously older TXs won't be shown.

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@Wesleyleung What should we do here? Show old Portico route TXs in the history or remove support for that?

@kev1n-peters kev1n-peters marked this pull request as draft March 26, 2025 22:09
@kev1n-peters
Copy link
Contributor Author

Holding off on merging this

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants