-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 212
Buy Now button with Variations #304
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Open
1bigidea
wants to merge
6
commits into
wp-e-commerce:master
Choose a base branch
from
1bigidea:buynow-variations
base: master
Could not load branches
Branch not found: {{ refName }}
Loading
Could not load tags
Nothing to show
Loading
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Some commits from the old base branch may be removed from the timeline,
and old review comments may become outdated.
Open
Changes from 4 commits
Commits
Show all changes
6 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
a53b53e
Buy Now button with Variations
1bigidea 1b2ec55
Escape the things
1bigidea eebb411
Use Disabled function, clean up code
1bigidea cafac86
Change $ to jQuery for consistency
1bigidea 61c0b2f
Reduce the calls to wpsc_product_has_variations
1bigidea 5b3f28b
Include disabled() in the input string directly
1bigidea File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Sorry to keep nit-picking! A couple things -
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I don't mind the criticism other than re-doing what was done before. (e.g. my if( $has_variants = wpsc……) )
On Mar 22, 2013, at 3:29 PM, JustinSainton [email protected] wrote:
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
And while the "disabled" function returns a leading space, pushing the %s up against "input" requires more "thinking" that the extra space costs. It looks like we are "modifying" the input value.
I would argue that it works against maintainable code.
On Mar 22, 2013, at 3:29 PM, JustinSainton [email protected] wrote:
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
No criticism intended - just a few small tweaks and we're there! And what was done before e.g. my if( $has_variants = wpsc……) wasn't quite right - it was checking if ( [...] ) on an assignment ($x = [...] ) - rather than a comparison.
I do see, from time to time, some clever coding (usually with transients, probably because of the codex) to this effect -
I can get behind that when readability isn't sacrificed, but that's not quite what was happening there.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
WRT disabled() - that makes sense. Looking through core, however, there's actually no instance anywhere of disabled() (or the other helper functions) being run through sprintf() or printf(). There is, however (especially with checked()), precedence for putting it directly next to the attribute.
So with that in mind, what I'd actually suggest is removing the placeholder for disabled() and putting that directly in the variable - next to wherever you want it, sans extra space. I think that keeps up with your note of maintainability/readability. And it eliminates the extra space.
That work for you?