Skip to content

Conversation

@vwheeler63
Copy link
Collaborator

@vwheeler63 vwheeler63 commented Sep 13, 2024

...and ended up "like this" inside an .RST file which merely puts underscores on either side of the terms which APPEAR to have been intended to be standard "emphasized" words. This appears to be a possible export-translation error from some software, which put the syntax for Markdown italics rather than reStructuredText italics.

I saw one of these while I was reading and decided to LOOK for such occurrences throughout the website .RST files and found these 5 occurrences.

An issue was not created for this.


📚 Documentation preview 📚: https://writethedocs-www--2219.org.readthedocs.build/

@vwheeler63 vwheeler63 force-pushed the fix/italics_where_was_intended branch from b13c167 to ee2875c Compare September 14, 2024 10:27
Copy link
Contributor

@plaindocs plaindocs left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Sounds right to me. Could just be folks thinking rst but writing markdown as well, I know I do it enough.

Thanks for looking and fixing.

...and ended up "_like this_" inside an .RST file which merely
puts underscores on either side of the terms which APPEAR to
have been intended to be standard "emphasized" words, but
appears to be a possible export-translation error from some
software, which put the syntax for Markdown _italics_ rather
than reStructuredText *italics*.

I saw one of these while I was reading and decided to LOOK for such
occurrences throughout the website .RST files and found these
5 occurrences.

An issue was not created for this.
@vwheeler63 vwheeler63 force-pushed the fix/italics_where_was_intended branch from ee2875c to 4187ab0 Compare September 17, 2024 09:34
@vwheeler63
Copy link
Collaborator Author

Sounds right to me. Could just be folks thinking rst but writing markdown as well, I know I do it enough.

Thanks for looking and fixing.

My pleasure! It appears this repository is set to only permit a merge if the the commit is based on the tip of master branch by the time it is ready to merge (I'm getting "This branch is out-of-date with the base branch" message). So I will rebase these changes on master.

@plaindocs plaindocs merged commit 3cf97ba into writethedocs:main Sep 17, 2024
6 checks passed
@vwheeler63 vwheeler63 deleted the fix/italics_where_was_intended branch September 17, 2024 11:36
@vwheeler63
Copy link
Collaborator Author

@plaindocs Hi, Sam! Thank you for the invitation to collaborate! I'm honored! 😃

@plaindocs
Copy link
Contributor

Always great to see folks interested in helping fix stuff!

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants