-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 50
Fixes: username and paths issues in the Moesif fault event #138
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
base: main
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Conversation
…to metadata and improving username sanitization
WalkthroughThis PR refactors username sanitization logic by extracting it into a dedicated helper method and enhances error-path event construction with more robust verb and URI derivation. Additionally, event validation schemas are extended with two new fields to support API method and resource template tracking. Changes
Estimated code review effort🎯 3 (Moderate) | ⏱️ ~20 minutes
Poem
Pre-merge checks and finishing touches❌ Failed checks (2 warnings)
✅ Passed checks (1 passed)
✨ Finishing touches
🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)
Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out. Comment |
...ublisher-client/src/main/java/org/wso2/am/analytics/publisher/client/SimpleMoesifClient.java
Show resolved
Hide resolved
...ublisher-client/src/main/java/org/wso2/am/analytics/publisher/client/SimpleMoesifClient.java
Show resolved
Hide resolved
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
AI Agent Log Improvement Checklist
- The log-related comments and suggestions in this review were generated by an AI tool to assist with identifying potential improvements. Purpose of reviewing the code for log improvements is to improve the troubleshooting capabilities of our products.
- Please make sure to manually review and validate all suggestions before applying any changes. Not every code suggestion would make sense or add value to our purpose. Therefore, you have the freedom to decide which of the suggestions are helpful.
✅ Before merging this pull request:
- Review all AI-generated comments for accuracy and relevance.
- Complete and verify the table below. We need your feedback to measure the accuracy of these suggestions and the value they add. If you are rejecting a certain code suggestion, please mention the reason briefly in the suggestion for us to capture it.
| Comment | Accepted (Y/N) | Reason |
|---|---|---|
| #### Log Improvement Suggestion No: 1 | N | |
| #### Log Improvement Suggestion No: 2 | N |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Actionable comments posted: 1
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
📒 Files selected for processing (2)
component/publisher-client/src/main/java/org/wso2/am/analytics/publisher/client/SimpleMoesifClient.java(3 hunks)component/publisher-client/src/main/java/org/wso2/am/analytics/publisher/reporter/GenericInputValidator.java(1 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
🧬 Code graph analysis (1)
component/publisher-client/src/main/java/org/wso2/am/analytics/publisher/client/SimpleMoesifClient.java (1)
component/publisher-client/src/main/java/org/wso2/am/analytics/publisher/util/Constants.java (1)
Constants(24-145)
Purpose
Approach
apiResourceTemplateand method to the required listTesting
Summary by CodeRabbit
Bug Fixes
New Features