Skip to content

Ensure Organization Validation When Changing Application Ownership #13047

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Closed

Conversation

ShakyaPr
Copy link
Contributor

Purpose

Approach

When updating the application owner via the Admin Portal, the system now retrieves the organizations of both the existing owner and the new user. Ownership update will proceed only if they share at least one common organization; otherwise, an error response will be returned.

Copy link

coderabbitai bot commented Mar 17, 2025

📝 Walkthrough

"""

Walkthrough

This change enhances the application ownership transfer process in the API management service. The updated logic in the applicationsApplicationIdChangeOwnerPost method validates that the new owner's organization matches the current owner's organization. Two helper methods, isSameOrganization and getUserOrg, were added to perform this verification. The application retrieval now occurs only after passing the organization check, ensuring proper error handling and logging of audit messages in case of failures.

Changes

File Change Summary
components/apimgt/.../ApplicationsApiServiceImpl.java Enhanced ownership transfer: added organization validation in applicationsApplicationIdChangeOwnerPost, introduced isSameOrganization and getUserOrg, and reordered control flow to perform validation before fetching the application instance.

Sequence Diagram(s)

sequenceDiagram
    participant Client
    participant Service as ApplicationsApiServiceImpl
    Client->>Service: applicationsApplicationIdChangeOwnerPost(request)
    Service->>Service: getUserOrg(currentOwner)
    Service->>Service: getUserOrg(newOwner)
    Service->>Service: isSameOrganization(currentOrg, newOrg)
    alt Organizations Match
        Service->>Service: Retrieve Application Instance
        Service->>Service: Update Application Owner
        Service->>Client: Return success response (audit logged)
    else Organizations Mismatch
        Service->>Client: Return bad request response
    end
Loading

Assessment against linked issues

Objective Addressed Explanation
Ensure same organization for new application owner (#3751)

Suggested reviewers

  • tgtshanika
  • chamilaadhi
  • Arshardh
  • dushaniw
  • AnuGayan
    """

📜 Recent review details

Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 9f18cf4 and 7f2bc43.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • components/apimgt/org.wso2.carbon.apimgt.rest.api.admin.v1/src/main/java/org/wso2/carbon/apimgt/rest/api/admin/v1/impl/ApplicationsApiServiceImpl.java (3 hunks)
🚧 Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (1)
  • components/apimgt/org.wso2.carbon.apimgt.rest.api.admin.v1/src/main/java/org/wso2/carbon/apimgt/rest/api/admin/v1/impl/ApplicationsApiServiceImpl.java
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms (6)
  • GitHub Check: build-product (3, group3)
  • GitHub Check: build-product (4, group4)
  • GitHub Check: build-product (1, group1)
  • GitHub Check: build-product (2, group2)
  • GitHub Check: run-benchmark-test
  • GitHub Check: build-carbon
✨ Finishing Touches
  • 📝 Generate Docstrings

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Explain this complex logic.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai explain this code block.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and explain its main purpose.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Support

Need help? Create a ticket on our support page for assistance with any issues or questions.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai generate docstrings to generate docstrings for this PR.
  • @coderabbitai generate sequence diagram to generate a sequence diagram of the changes in this PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

ShakyaPr added 2 commits May 26, 2025 11:04
…ixes/fix_3751_user_org_validation

pull latest changes from upstream
coderabbitai[bot]
coderabbitai bot previously approved these changes May 26, 2025
…ixes/fix_3751_user_org_validation

pull upstream latest changes
DinithHerath
DinithHerath previously approved these changes May 30, 2025
@ShakyaPr ShakyaPr dismissed stale reviews from DinithHerath and coderabbitai[bot] via 7f2bc43 June 5, 2025 10:26
@ShakyaPr ShakyaPr closed this Jun 6, 2025
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Changing the Owner of an Application does not work in APIM v4.5.0 as expected
3 participants