Skip to content

Fix x-forwareded-for header validation using apache commons-validation #13048

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Mar 31, 2025

Conversation

Oshanath
Copy link
Contributor

Related issue: wso2/api-manager#3759

Copy link

coderabbitai bot commented Mar 19, 2025

📝 Walkthrough

Walkthrough

This pull request introduces a new dependency, commons-validator, into the project’s pom.xml. The change in the DataProcessAndPublishingAgent class replaces previously used regex patterns for IPv4 and IPv6 validation with the InetAddressValidator from the newly added library. Import statements have been updated accordingly to remove unused imports and include the new validator class.

Changes

File(s) Change Summary
components/apimgt/.../pom.xml Added a new dependency for commons-validator with the specified groupId and artifactId.
components/apimgt/.../DataProcessAndPublishingAgent.java Removed static regex patterns for IPv4 and IPv6 addresses; replaced them with InetAddressValidator method calls; updated imports to remove unused classes and include the validator.

Sequence Diagram(s)

sequenceDiagram
    participant Agent as DataProcessAndPublishingAgent
    participant Validator as InetAddressValidator

    Agent->>Validator: isValidInet4Address(ipAddress)
    Validator-->>Agent: returns boolean
    Agent->>Validator: isValidInet6Address(ipAddress) [if IPv4 check fails]
    Validator-->>Agent: returns boolean
Loading

Possibly related PRs

Suggested reviewers

  • tgtshanika
  • chamilaadhi
  • dushaniw
  • Arshardh
  • AnuGayan

Tip

⚡🧪 Multi-step agentic review comment chat (experimental)
  • We're introducing multi-step agentic chat in review comments. This experimental feature enhances review discussions with the CodeRabbit agentic chat by enabling advanced interactions, including the ability to create pull requests directly from comments.
    - To enable this feature, set early_access to true under in the settings.
✨ Finishing Touches
  • 📝 Generate Docstrings

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai generate docstrings to generate docstrings for this PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

Copy link

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 0

🧹 Nitpick comments (1)
components/apimgt/org.wso2.carbon.apimgt.gateway/src/main/java/org/wso2/carbon/apimgt/gateway/throttling/publisher/DataProcessAndPublishingAgent.java (1)

236-247: Good replacement of regex patterns with InetAddressValidator.

Replacing custom regex patterns with Apache Commons Validator's InetAddressValidator is a significant improvement. This change:

  1. Utilizes a well-tested library for IP validation
  2. Improves code readability and maintainability
  3. Better handles edge cases in IP address validation
  4. Makes the code more robust against IP validation vulnerabilities

The flow logic remains the same while improving the validation mechanism.

One thing to consider is adding unit tests to verify this validation mechanism works as expected with various IP formats, especially since this PR addresses an issue related to x-forwarded-for header validation.

Would you like me to suggest a unit test implementation to validate this change?

📜 Review details

Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 5ee9d1e and 308ce55.

📒 Files selected for processing (2)
  • components/apimgt/org.wso2.carbon.apimgt.gateway/pom.xml (1 hunks)
  • components/apimgt/org.wso2.carbon.apimgt.gateway/src/main/java/org/wso2/carbon/apimgt/gateway/throttling/publisher/DataProcessAndPublishingAgent.java (2 hunks)
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms (6)
  • GitHub Check: build-product (4, group4)
  • GitHub Check: build-product (3, group3)
  • GitHub Check: build-product (2, group2)
  • GitHub Check: run-benchmark-test
  • GitHub Check: build-product (1, group1)
  • GitHub Check: build-carbon
🔇 Additional comments (2)
components/apimgt/org.wso2.carbon.apimgt.gateway/pom.xml (1)

336-339:

✅ Verification successful

Good addition of commons-validator dependency.

Adding the commons-validator library is a good choice for IP address validation. It provides robust and well-tested validation utilities that are more reliable than custom regex patterns.

However, I notice there's no explicit version specified for this dependency. This is fine if it's managed by a parent POM, but it's worth ensuring that a compatible and secure version is being used.


🏁 Script executed:

#!/bin/bash
# Check which version of commons-validator is being used

# Look for the version in the parent pom or dependencyManagement section
grep -r "<commons-validator.version>" --include="*.xml" .
grep -r "<artifactId>commons-validator</artifactId>" --include="*.xml" . -A 3

Length of output: 1614


Dependency Version Management Verified

The addition of the commons-validator dependency looks great for IP address validation. I confirmed that while the dependency in the gateway's POM does not specify a version explicitly, the parent POM defines the ${commons-validator.version} property (currently set to 1.7) and manages the dependency centrally. This approach ensures consistency across modules while avoiding redundancy. Please ensure that version 1.7 remains compatible and secure in future updates.

components/apimgt/org.wso2.carbon.apimgt.gateway/src/main/java/org/wso2/carbon/apimgt/gateway/throttling/publisher/DataProcessAndPublishingAgent.java (1)

9-9: Correctly added import for InetAddressValidator.

Adding the import for org.apache.commons.validator.routines.InetAddressValidator is appropriate for the implementation changes that follow.

@ashera96 ashera96 merged commit b955512 into wso2:master Mar 31, 2025
7 of 8 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants