Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Add commons validator to the gateway feature. #13069

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Apr 7, 2025
Merged

Conversation

Oshanath
Copy link
Contributor

@Oshanath Oshanath commented Apr 4, 2025

No description provided.

Copy link

coderabbitai bot commented Apr 4, 2025

📝 Walkthrough

Walkthrough

This pull request updates the API Gateway feature’s POM configuration to include the commons-validator library. The changes add a new dependency declaration and a corresponding bundle definition using a version placeholder. These modifications adjust the project’s dependency management setup without altering any control flows or application logic.

Changes

File(s) Change Summary
features/apimgt/.../pom.xml Added a new <dependency> block for commons-validator (groupId: commons-validator, artifactId: commons-validator, version: ${commons-validator.version}). Also added a corresponding <bundleDef> entry for the same library.

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai generate docstrings to generate docstrings for this PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai plan to trigger planning for file edits and PR creation.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

Copy link

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 0

🧹 Nitpick comments (1)
features/apimgt/org.wso2.carbon.apimgt.rest.api.gateway.feature/pom.xml (1)

58-62: Verify the Commons Validator Dependency Configuration.
The new dependency for commons-validator has been added correctly using the version placeholder ${commons-validator.version}. Please ensure that this property is defined in the parent POM or an appropriate properties section so that Maven can resolve the version during the build.

📜 Review details

Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 759671b and 9f947e1.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • features/apimgt/org.wso2.carbon.apimgt.rest.api.gateway.feature/pom.xml (2 hunks)
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms (6)
  • GitHub Check: build-product (3, group3)
  • GitHub Check: build-product (1, group1)
  • GitHub Check: build-product (2, group2)
  • GitHub Check: run-benchmark-test
  • GitHub Check: build-product (4, group4)
  • GitHub Check: build-carbon
🔇 Additional comments (1)
features/apimgt/org.wso2.carbon.apimgt.rest.api.gateway.feature/pom.xml (1)

166-166: Confirm Bundle Definition for Commons Validator.
The <bundleDef> entry for commons-validator follows the existing convention, which is good. Please verify that including this bundle is necessary for your OSGi configuration or deployment requirements, and that the version placeholder will be replaced correctly at build time.

@dushaniw dushaniw merged commit 1b1bb2c into wso2:master Apr 7, 2025
4 of 14 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants