Fix vulnerabilities

[gigara]

Purpose

Describe the problems, issues, or needs driving this feature/fix and include links to related issues in the following format: Resolves issue1, issue2, etc.

Goals

Describe the solutions that this feature/fix will introduce to resolve the problems described above

Approach

Describe how you are implementing the solutions. Include an animated GIF or screenshot if the change affects the UI (email documentation@wso2.com to review all UI text). Include a link to a Markdown file or Google doc if the feature write-up is too long to paste here.

UI Component Development

Specify the reason if following are not followed.

• Added reusable UI components to the ui-toolkit. Follow the intructions when adding the componenent.
• Use ui-toolkit components wherever possible. Run npm run storybook from the root directory to view current components.
• Matches with the native VSCode look and feel.

Manage Icons

Specify the reason if following are not followed.

• Added Icons to the font-wso2-vscode. Follow the instructions.

User stories

Summary of user stories addressed by this change>

Release note

Brief description of the new feature or bug fix as it will appear in the release notes

Documentation

Link(s) to product documentation that addresses the changes of this PR. If no doc impact, enter “N/A” plus brief explanation of why there’s no doc impact

Training

Link to the PR for changes to the training content in https://github.com/wso2/WSO2-Training, if applicable

Certification

Type “Sent” when you have provided new/updated certification questions, plus four answers for each question (correct answer highlighted in bold), based on this change. Certification questions/answers should be sent to certification@wso2.com and NOT pasted in this PR. If there is no impact on certification exams, type “N/A” and explain why.

Marketing

Link to drafts of marketing content that will describe and promote this feature, including product page changes, technical articles, blog posts, videos, etc., if applicable

Automation tests

• Unit tests

  Code coverage information

• Integration tests

  Details about the test cases and coverage

Security checks

• Followed secure coding standards in http://wso2.com/technical-reports/wso2-secure-engineering-guidelines? yes/no
• Ran FindSecurityBugs plugin and verified report? yes/no
• Confirmed that this PR doesn't commit any keys, passwords, tokens, usernames, or other secrets? yes/no

Samples

Provide high-level details about the samples related to this feature

Related PRs

List any other related PRs

Migrations (if applicable)

Describe migration steps and platforms on which migration has been tested

Test environment

List all JDK versions, operating systems, databases, and browser/versions on which this feature/fix was tested

Learning

Describe the research phase and any blog posts, patterns, libraries, or add-ons you used to solve the problem.

Summary by CodeRabbit

• Chores
  • Updated provider utility dependency to a newer patch version.

[coderabbitai]

Warning

Review limit reached

@gigara, we couldn't start this review because you've reached your PR review rate limit.

More reviews will be available in 6 minutes and 55 seconds. Learn how PR review limits work.

Your organization has run out of usage credits. Purchase more credits in the billing tab to continue.

⌛ How to resolve this issue?

After more reviews become available, a review can be triggered using the @coderabbitai review command as a PR comment. Alternatively, push new commits to this PR.

To avoid repeated limits, reduce automatic review volume by pausing incremental auto-reviews earlier, using label-based review opt-in, excluding WIP or generated PR titles, or requesting reviews manually when the PR is ready. If your team needs uninterrupted high-volume reviews, an organization admin can enable usage-based credits.

🚦 How do rate limits work?

CodeRabbit enforces per-developer PR review limits for each organization. Most developers receive the normal plan refill rate.

For paid Pro and Pro+ PR reviews, CodeRabbit uses rolling per-developer review limits. Reviews become available again as older review attempts age out of the rolling limit window.

Please see our Fair Usage Limits Policy for further information.

ℹ️ Review info

⚙️ Run configuration

Configuration used: Path: .coderabbit.yaml

Review profile: CHILL

Plan: Pro

Run ID: 8c1af343-eaae-4ace-8189-a660113114fa

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between ce347e6 and 4d66d3a.

⛔ Files ignored due to path filters (1)

• common/config/rush/pnpm-lock.yaml is excluded by !**/pnpm-lock.yaml

📒 Files selected for processing (1)

• common/config/rush/pnpm-config.json

📝 Walkthrough

Walkthrough

The PNPM dependency override for @ai-sdk/provider-utils in common/config/rush/.pnpmfile.cjs is bumped from version 3.0.25 to 3.0.27 within the applyOverrides hook for the 3.x version match case. No other logic is changed.

Changes

PNPM Dependency Override Bump

Layer / File(s)	Summary
@ai-sdk/provider-utils override version update common/config/rush/.pnpmfile.cjs	The pinned override for @ai-sdk/provider-utils in the 3.x match branch of applyOverrides is changed from 3.0.25 to 3.0.27.

Estimated code review effort

🎯 1 (Trivial) | ⏱️ ~2 minutes

Suggested reviewers

• hevayo

Poem

🐰 A single digit leaps from five to seven,
The SDK version climbs a little closer to heaven.
No logic was harmed, no structure was bent,
Just one tiny number bumped, and away it went!
Hippity hop, the patch is now set! 🎉

🚥 Pre-merge checks | ✅ 2 | ❌ 3

❌ Failed checks (2 warnings, 1 inconclusive)

Check name	Status	Explanation	Resolution
Description check	⚠️ Warning	The PR description contains only the template structure with no actual details filled in regarding the vulnerabilities, remediation approach, or testing performed.	Complete all required sections including Purpose (with issue links), Goals, Approach, Release note, and Security checks confirmation to provide necessary context for the vulnerability fix.
Docstring Coverage	⚠️ Warning	Docstring coverage is 0.00% which is insufficient. The required threshold is 80.00%.	Write docstrings for the functions missing them to satisfy the coverage threshold.
Title check	❓ Inconclusive	The title 'Fix vulnerabilities' is vague and generic, lacking specificity about which vulnerabilities were fixed or which component was affected.	Revise the title to be more specific, such as 'Update @ai-sdk/provider-utils to 3.0.27 to address security vulnerabilities' to clearly indicate the component and version change.

✅ Passed checks (2 passed)

Check name	Status	Explanation
Linked Issues check	✅ Passed	Check skipped because no linked issues were found for this pull request.
Out of Scope Changes check	✅ Passed	Check skipped because no linked issues were found for this pull request.

_{✏️ Tip: You can configure your own custom pre-merge checks in the settings.}

✨ Finishing Touches

🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)

• Create PR with unit tests

---

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share

• X
• Mastodon
• Reddit
• LinkedIn

_{Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands.}