Skip to content

Revert CODEOWNERS scoping (approach not achievable on GitHub)#51

Merged
asachs01 merged 1 commit into
mainfrom
chore/restore-codeowners
Jul 22, 2026
Merged

Revert CODEOWNERS scoping (approach not achievable on GitHub)#51
asachs01 merged 1 commit into
mainfrom
chore/restore-codeowners

Conversation

@asachs01

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Restores the original catch-all CODEOWNERS. See commit body: dropping required approvals to 0 to allow self-merge silently disables the workflow code-owner gate, so the intended split isn't possible via branch protection. Reverting to known-good.

Restores the catch-all owner. The scoping change was paired with dropping
branch protection's required-approval count to 0, but GitHub only enforces
require_code_owner_reviews when the count is >=1 — at 0 the workflow
supply-chain gate silently stops firing (verified: a workflow-touching PR
showed reviewDecision=null). Since 'zero review for normal PRs + code-owner
gate for workflows' is therefore not achievable via branch protection,
restore the original known-good configuration.
@asachs01
asachs01 merged commit d9b663b into main Jul 22, 2026
6 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant