Skip to content

Remove xacodex organization references incorrectly added in PR #854#856

Merged
professoroakz merged 2 commits intoproductionfrom
copilot/revert-xacodex-introduced
Jan 9, 2026
Merged

Remove xacodex organization references incorrectly added in PR #854#856
professoroakz merged 2 commits intoproductionfrom
copilot/revert-xacodex-introduced

Conversation

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Copilot AI commented Jan 1, 2026

PR #854 incorrectly introduced references to a xacodex organization throughout the repository. This PR reverts those changes, restoring the repository to only reference the correct xaoex organization.

Changes

  • README.md - Removed xacodex from installation commands and organization listing
  • PACKAGE.md - Removed xacodex from npm/Docker installation instructions
  • PUBLISHING.md - Removed xacodex from package publishing configuration
  • XACODEX_ORGANIZATION.md - Deleted file entirely

All package scopes, registry configurations, and Docker image references now correctly reference only @xaoex and ghcr.io/xaoex.

Original prompt

the last merged pr introduced xacodex incorrectly and added it into this xaoex repo. please go back to how it was before this PR and make merge request


✨ Let Copilot coding agent set things up for you — coding agent works faster and does higher quality work when set up for your repo.

Co-authored-by: professoroakz <6593422+professoroakz@users.noreply.github.com>
@professoroakz professoroakz marked this pull request as ready for review January 1, 2026 17:29
Copilot AI changed the title [WIP] Revert introduction of xacodex in xaoex repository Remove xacodex organization references incorrectly added in PR #854 Jan 1, 2026
Copilot AI requested a review from professoroakz January 1, 2026 17:30
@professoroakz professoroakz merged commit 82fa47d into production Jan 9, 2026
20 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants