Open
Conversation
6fc1b9c to
89137f7
Compare
Codecov Report
@@ Coverage Diff @@
## master #22 +/- ##
===========================================
- Coverage 100.00% 96.23% -3.77%
===========================================
Files 23 25 +2
Lines 1462 1567 +105
===========================================
+ Hits 1462 1508 +46
- Misses 0 59 +59
Continue to review full report at Codecov.
|
Contributor
Author
|
just rebased to current master, no changes :) |
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Hi :)
I am currently testing WIP demo implementation of something i call LazyLattice (and LazyConcept).
Typical application is when you wanna construct Lattice with one concept and find its upper and lower neighbours (and nothing more).
Biggest priority was to keep the API as close as possible, because users could want to use Concept and LazyConcept as interchangeable arguments to other functions.
The whole magic is here and here.
Are you interested in this feature in the main branch? It is still work in progress (no docstring, API not complete etc.). This feature is necessary for my research so I will implement i anyway (in fcapsy package, which should still keep compatibility).
Ideas are welcomed :) (btw I feel that this feature is more important than #15)
Small demo: