Conversation
This commit enhances README.md with: - Enhanced Structure - Enhanced Content
|
I'll write CONTRIBUTING.md next. |
|
@thedevmystic If you did the copilot comment please don't again. I HATE generative AI and don't want it used on this project at all. |
|
Oh sorry, I didn't wanted to do that? As you can see I already summarized the PR in the top comment. I think when I requested you a review I mistakenly tapped on the Copilot too (initiated the PR from mobile). |
|
Anyways review the changes and check for any typos or grammatical changes you want. |
|
Have you made the suggested changes? |
|
Sorry, but what suggested changes? I don't see any suggestions or changes requested? |
|
|
||
| ### Supported Languages | ||
|
|
||
| The languages which are supported by **EsoProg** are as following: |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Merge this with the Roadmap
There was a problem hiding this comment.
On IDEs we keep specific section for "Supported Languages" because once roadmap is completed and we are in maintaince phase we usually remove roadmap completely. So, I think keeping an specific "Supported Languages" for an IDE is better.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
This project is kind of not intended to ever finish. It's being built to be very easy to add support for new languages so that users can just keep adding support as they like
There was a problem hiding this comment.
I meant "Supported Languages" is like badge to an IDE. Even VS Code which is plugin-based IDE contains that it supports C/C++, Python, etc...
It shows user what they can expect from an IDE. And yes user may be able to add new languages on will, but we are not adding it.
So, what a user may expect should be in "Supported Languages"
Like say we add Shakespeare's Language in future then we just add it in supported languages and that's it.
|
My bad. I'm used to a different review software. |
This PR addresses: