Skip to content

Conversation

@AustinAbro321
Copy link
Member

Description

WIP

Related Issue

Fixes #4474

Checklist before merging

Signed-off-by: Austin Abro <[email protected]>
@netlify
Copy link

netlify bot commented Dec 18, 2025

Deploy Preview for zarf-docs canceled.

Name Link
🔨 Latest commit 637d3d3
🔍 Latest deploy log https://app.netlify.com/projects/zarf-docs/deploys/6945700598b2f500088647dc

@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented Dec 18, 2025

Codecov Report

❌ Patch coverage is 38.63636% with 27 lines in your changes missing coverage. Please review.

Files with missing lines Patch % Lines
src/pkg/cluster/secrets.go 35.71% 25 Missing and 2 partials ⚠️
Files with missing lines Coverage Δ
src/internal/agent/hooks/flux-helmrepo.go 77.50% <100.00%> (ø)
src/internal/agent/hooks/flux-ocirepo.go 82.64% <100.00%> (ø)
src/pkg/cluster/tunnel.go 9.22% <ø> (ø)
src/pkg/cluster/secrets.go 54.81% <35.71%> (-8.58%) ⬇️

... and 5 files with indirect coverage changes

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
  • ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.
  • 📦 JS Bundle Analysis: Save yourself from yourself by tracking and limiting bundle sizes in JS merges.

}

return fmt.Sprintf("%s:%d", svc.Spec.ClusterIP, port), nil
return fmt.Sprintf("%s.%s.svc.cluster.local:%d", svc.Name, svc.Namespace, port), nil
Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Changing behavior of the nodeport service as well. I cannot think of any reason we initially used clusterip. Seems like hostname is a more consistent alternative.

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Also a little un-educated guess, but I wonder if it is because not every cluster uses cluster.local as its FQDN?

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

Status: No status

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

When using [alpha] feature registry-mode, OCIRepo resource not properly mutated to intra-cluster endpoint

3 participants