Conversation
|
Any update on this? FYI, the TU doesn't need to be 100% for you to mark it as "ready for review". |
ah sorry, got busy with other things. I made a lot of progress on this, I think it was mostly just down to regalloc stuff. I'll do a bit of cleanup and then open it up for review |
Report for D44J01 (27f0df1 - 1672534)📈 Matched code: 42.17% (+0.17%, +13012 bytes) ✅ 118 new matches
...and 88 more new matches 📈 12 improvements in unmatched functions
Report for GZLE01 (27f0df1 - 1672534)📈 Matched code: 54.38% (+0.19%, +14728 bytes) ✅ 120 new matches
...and 90 more new matches 📈 11 improvements in unmatched functions
Report for GZLP01 (27f0df1 - 1672534)📈 Matched code: 53.00% (+0.19%, +14728 bytes) ✅ 120 new matches
...and 90 more new matches 📈 11 improvements in unmatched functions
Report for GZLJ01 (27f0df1 - 1672534)📈 Matched code: 53.09% (+0.19%, +14716 bytes) ✅ 120 new matches
...and 90 more new matches 📈 11 improvements in unmatched functions
|
| // static int bmd_data[8] = { | ||
| // MT_BDL_MG_HEAD, MT_BDL_MG_BODY, MT_BDL_MG_BODY, MT_BDL_MG_BODY, | ||
| // MT_BDL_MG_BODY, MT_BDL_MG_BODY, MT_BDL_MG_BODY, MT_BDL_MG_TAIL | ||
| // }; | ||
|
|
||
| // static f32 scale_data[8] = { | ||
| // 1.0f, 1.0f, 1.0f, 0.975f, 0.925f, 0.825f, 0.75f, 0.525f | ||
| // }; | ||
|
|
||
| // static int br_bmd[3] = { | ||
| // MT_BDL_KBA, MT_BDL_KBB, MT_BDL_KBC | ||
| // }; |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
these seem to be in .data twice for some reason?
| const char* unused[4] = { | ||
| "i_this->btk[i]", | ||
| "i_this->brk[i]", | ||
| "i_this->br_modelL[i] != 0", | ||
| "i_this->br_modelR[i] != 0" | ||
| }; |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
these strings are in .rodata even though they're not used anywhere?
94% .data
98% .text