Skip to content

PSA key-slot leak in Bluetooth Mesh subnet deletion leading to resource-exhaustion DoS

Low
d3zd3z published GHSA-6q7g-798f-76p2 Aug 2, 2026

Software

zephyr

Affected versions

>= 3.6.0, <= 4.4.1

Patched versions

4.5.0

Description

Zephyr's Bluetooth Mesh subnet key management leaks one PSA Crypto key slot on every subnet-key teardown. In subsys/bluetooth/mesh/subnet.c, net_keys_create() imports the Private Beacon Key into a PSA key slot under CONFIG_BT_MESH_PRIV_BEACONS (enabled by default), but subnet_keys_destroy() guarded the matching psa_destroy_key() with CONFIG_BT_MESH_V1d1. That Kconfig symbol was removed when explicit Mesh 1.0.1 support was dropped, so the destroy branch became permanently dead code and the import is never balanced by a destroy.

The imbalanced teardown is reached every time subnet keys are destroyed: deleting a subnet (Config Server NetKey Delete), completing a Key Refresh Procedure (which retires the old key set), and resetting/re-provisioning the node. The over-the-air triggers are processed only under the node's device key, so they are exercisable by the provisioner or network administrator that owns the node, reachable over the Bluetooth Mesh network.

With the default CONFIG_MBEDTLS_PSA_KEY_SLOT_COUNT of 16, repeated add/delete or key-refresh cycles exhaust the shared PSA key-slot pool after roughly a dozen rounds. Once exhausted, bt_mesh_private_beacon_key() and thus subnet creation fail: the node can no longer add subnets or complete key refresh, and other PSA crypto consumers on the device may be starved, until the device is rebooted. The fix aligns the destroy guard with the import guard (CONFIG_BT_MESH_PRIV_BEACONS) so each slot is freed.

Affected components

  • subsys/bluetooth/mesh

Affected versions

>= 3.6.0, <= 4.4.1

Fix

Fixed (merged) in f573da9

Projected fixed version: 4.5.0 (the fix is merged on main but not yet released; this forecast should be confirmed against the actual release).

Introduced by: 981c79b ("Bluetooth: Mesh: Drop explicit support for Bluetooth Mesh 1.0.1") removed CONFIG_BT_MESH_V1d1 but left subnet_keys_destroy() guarding the priv_beacon destroy with it, making the branch dead

Evidence

  • subsys/bluetooth/mesh/subnet.c:205-207 — post-fix destroy guard now CONFIG_BT_MESH_PRIV_BEACONS; pre-fix was CONFIG_BT_MESH_V1d1 (dead) per diff
  • subsys/bluetooth/mesh/subnet.c:355-363 — net_keys_create imports priv_beacon under CONFIG_BT_MESH_PRIV_BEACONS, the mismatched (live) guard
  • subsys/bluetooth/mesh/crypto.c:239 + crypto.h:77-80 — bt_mesh_private_beacon_key -> bt_mesh_id128 -> bt_mesh_key_import (psa_import_key), confirming a PSA slot is consumed
  • subsys/bluetooth/mesh/crypto_psa.c:494-496 — bt_mesh_key_destroy calls psa_destroy_key, the freeing call that was skipped
  • subsys/bluetooth/mesh/subnet.c:233,289,876 — three subnet_keys_destroy call sites: KRP phase-3, subnet_del, and stack reset
  • subsys/bluetooth/mesh/cfg_srv.c:1673,1718,2488,2490 — OP_NET_KEY_ADD/DEL Config Server handlers (DevKey-authenticated) reaching subnet add/del over the air
  • modules/mbedtls/Kconfig.tf-psa-crypto:387 — CONFIG_MBEDTLS_PSA_KEY_SLOT_COUNT default 16, the exhaustible pool
  • git tag --contains 981c79b -> v3.6.0+ : the dead guard shipped in releases (reportable)

Patches

Branch Pull request Status
main #110235 merged
v4.4-branch #110438 merged
v4.3-branch #110437 merged
v3.7-branch #110436 merged

For more information

If you have any questions or comments about this advisory:

embargo: 2026-08-02

Severity

Low

CVSS overall score

This score calculates overall vulnerability severity from 0 to 10 and is based on the Common Vulnerability Scoring System (CVSS).
/ 10

CVSS v3 base metrics

Attack vector
Adjacent
Attack complexity
Low
Privileges required
High
User interaction
None
Scope
Unchanged
Confidentiality
None
Integrity
None
Availability
Low

CVSS v3 base metrics

Attack vector: More severe the more the remote (logically and physically) an attacker can be in order to exploit the vulnerability.
Attack complexity: More severe for the least complex attacks.
Privileges required: More severe if no privileges are required.
User interaction: More severe when no user interaction is required.
Scope: More severe when a scope change occurs, e.g. one vulnerable component impacts resources in components beyond its security scope.
Confidentiality: More severe when loss of data confidentiality is highest, measuring the level of data access available to an unauthorized user.
Integrity: More severe when loss of data integrity is the highest, measuring the consequence of data modification possible by an unauthorized user.
Availability: More severe when the loss of impacted component availability is highest.
CVSS:3.1/AV:A/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:L

CVE ID

CVE-2026-10774

Weaknesses

Missing Release of Memory after Effective Lifetime

The product does not sufficiently track and release allocated memory after it has been used, making the memory unavailable for reallocation and reuse. Learn more on MITRE.