fix: benchmark cannot run as expected#8
Conversation
Summary of ChangesHello @alphabetc1, I'm Gemini Code Assist1! I'm currently reviewing this pull request and will post my feedback shortly. In the meantime, here's a summary to help you and other reviewers quickly get up to speed! This pull request addresses an issue where benchmark scripts were not running as expected by updating the core benchmarking module and correcting model references. It also includes general cleanup by ignoring generated output files and removing previously committed stale data, alongside a minor documentation formatting fix. These changes ensure the benchmark system functions correctly and maintains a clean repository state. Highlights
Changelog
Activity
Using Gemini Code AssistThe full guide for Gemini Code Assist can be found on our documentation page, here are some quick tips. Invoking Gemini You can request assistance from Gemini at any point by creating a comment using either
Customization To customize Gemini Code Assist for GitHub experience, repository maintainers can create a configuration file and/or provide a custom code review style guide (such as PEP-8 for Python) by creating and adding files to a Limitations & Feedback Gemini Code Assist may make mistakes. Please leave feedback on any instances where its feedback is incorrect or counter productive. You can react with 👍 and 👎 on @gemini-code-assist comments. If you're interested in giving your feedback about your experience with Gemini Code Assist for Github and other Google products, sign up here. You can also get AI-powered code generation, chat, as well as code reviews directly in the IDE at no cost with the Gemini Code Assist IDE Extension. Footnotes
|
d6643db to
516f7a4
Compare
516f7a4 to
0ec855f
Compare
Motivation
fix #7 and #6
Modification
Benchmark Results:
SGLANG_USE_MODELSCOPE=TRUE python tests/benchmarks/diffusion_router/bench_routing_algorithms.py --model Qwen/Qwen-Image --num-workers 2 --num-prompts 10 --max-concurrency 2