Skip to content

Conversation

@puddly
Copy link
Contributor

@puddly puddly commented Oct 14, 2025

@puddly puddly force-pushed the puddly/restore-routing-table branch from 28270d2 to 39a2c87 Compare October 27, 2025 14:32
@puddly puddly force-pushed the puddly/restore-routing-table branch from 39a2c87 to 55d537b Compare October 27, 2025 14:59
@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented Oct 27, 2025

Codecov Report

✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests.
✅ Project coverage is 99.55%. Comparing base (4d31bb4) to head (f6bd25d).
⚠️ Report is 1 commits behind head on dev.

Additional details and impacted files
@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##              dev     #690   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   99.54%   99.55%           
=======================================
  Files          58       58           
  Lines        3975     4039   +64     
=======================================
+ Hits         3957     4021   +64     
  Misses         18       18           

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
  • ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.

@puddly puddly merged commit 02d7870 into zigpy:dev Oct 27, 2025
12 checks passed
channel=t.uint8_t(25),
channel_mask=t.Channels.ALL_CHANNELS,
security_level=t.uint8_t(1),
tx_power=0,
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

For the zigpy_backup fixture:
Shouldn't matter for the test, but was this intentionally set to 0, instead of e.g. 8?

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I think I set it to 0 to implicitly test if tx_power: type logic but that should probably have instead been made explicitly into a new test.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants