Skip to content

Conversation

@Goutham024
Copy link

Description

Please include a summary of the change and which issue is fixed. Please also include relevant motivation and context. List any dependencies that are required for this change.

Linked to #4365
Part of the # (epic)

Type of change

Please delete options that are not relevant.

  • fix: Bug fix (non-breaking change which fixes an issue)
  • feat: New feature (non-breaking change which adds functionality)
  • docs: Change in a documentation
  • refactor: Refactor the code
  • chore: Chore, repository cleanup, updates the dependencies.
  • BREAKING CHANGE or !: Breaking change (fix or feature that would cause existing functionality to not work as expected)

Checklist:

  • My code follows the style guidelines of this project
  • PR title conforms to commit message guideline ## Commit Message Structure Guideline
  • I have commented my code, particularly in hard-to-understand areas. In JS I did provide JSDoc
  • I have made corresponding changes to the documentation
  • My changes generate no new warnings
  • I have added tests that prove my fix is effective or that my feature works
  • New and existing unit tests pass locally with my changes
  • The java tests in the area I was working on leverage @nested annotations
  • Any dependent changes have been merged and published in downstream modules

For more details about how should the code look like read the Contributing guideline

@Goutham024 Goutham024 marked this pull request as draft October 30, 2025 05:10
@Goutham024 Goutham024 mentioned this pull request Oct 30, 2025
10 tasks
@Goutham024 Goutham024 changed the title API for delegating credentials to generate a z/OS PassTicket feat: API for delegating credentials to generate a z/OS PassTicket Oct 30, 2025
@Goutham024
Copy link
Author

OLD PR: #4364
In the above PR I encountered multiple merge conflicts while rebasing for the DCO fix, as the branch was behind 155 commits with v3.x.x. After trying to sync with the latest changes, the conflicts became quite extensive and time-consuming to resolve. To simplify the process, I’ve created a this PR instead. Please review the PR.

@havenkat
Copy link

@balhar-jakub @pablocarle there was some issue with the previous pr for signing, hence created this new one. we will discuss in this pr.
CC: @Joe-Winchester

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

Projects

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants