Parametrize mouting transform for the gripper#11
Merged
sivral merged 6 commits intohumble-develfrom Jun 27, 2025
Merged
Conversation
macmacal
reviewed
Jun 27, 2025
macmacal
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
After small changelog update, it will be ready to be merged
Co-authored-by: Maciej Aleksandrowicz <mac.aleksandrowicz@gmail.com>
3 tasks
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Description
This PR makes the relative pose between the robot flange and the gripper configurable.
The fixed joint between the parent link and the coupler is now parameterized via
xyzandrpyparameters inrobotiq_hande_gripper.xacro.Resolves the issue in the source repository: macmacal#8 (a reverse PR must be done afterwards).
Motivation and context
The default fixed transform assumes a specific flange alignment. On different robot arms or mounting setups, this identity transform may not be valid.
How has this been tested?
In RViz by launching the robot description.
Checklist