-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 8
Example model configs for telecommute_status model
#30
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Conversation
|
The test is failing when validating the result against the target pipeline because we split the telecommute frequency category 2_3_days_week into two categories, 2_days_week and 3_days_week, as requested. As a result, half of the person records that previously had 2_3_days_week now have 2_days_week, and the other half have 3_days_week. I can update the target pipeline if that's ok. @jpn-- |
|
@jpn--, this PR is ready to be merged. Additionally, I fixed the CI workflow - it was testing against the latest release instead of the 'main' branch of ActivitySim. |
@yueshuaing This PR implements example model configs developed as part of the ActivitySim Phase 9 work. The code changes that pair with this PR is in ActivitySim/activitysim#935
telecommute_statusmodeltelecommute_statusmodel beforecdap(Note: This is different from the final explicit telecommute model design that was developed in subsequent Phase 9B telecommute design efforts.)[x] Made mandatory pattern unavailable for worker who is telecommuting on simulation day inUpdate: The result ofcdapconfigtelecommute_statusmodel is not used in any downstream models.2_3_days_weekinto two categories,2_days_weekand3_days_weektelecommute_fredequency == 2_3_days_weekwithtelecommute_fredequency == 2_days_week | telecommute_fredequency == 3_days_weekin downstream model UECs