Skip to content

Conversation

@bredmond5
Copy link
Contributor

@bredmond5 bredmond5 commented Nov 4, 2024

Pull Request Template

Description

If the qr codes get too big (in total file size), then the current function will blow up. This one works better, tested manually by updating the dist/build.js, and updating example.html to point to that instead of the production cdn hosted websdk

I couldnt get this new one to overflow

Fixes # (issue)

Type of change

Please delete options that are not relevant.

  • Bug fix (non-breaking change which fixes an issue)
  • New feature (non-breaking change which adds functionality)
  • Breaking change (fix or feature that would cause existing functionality to not work as expected)
  • This change requires a documentation update

How Has This Been Tested?

Please describe the tests that you ran to verify your changes. Provide instructions so we can reproduce. Please also list any relevant details for your test configuration

  • Unit test
  • Integration test

JS Budget Check

Please mention the size in kb before abd after this PR

Files Before After
dist/build.js.
dist/build.min.js

Checklist:

  • My code follows the style guidelines of this project
  • I have performed a self-review of my own code
  • I have commented my code, particularly in hard-to-understand areas
  • I have made corresponding changes to the documentation
  • My changes generate no new warnings
  • I have added tests that prove my fix is effective or that my feature works
  • New and existing unit tests pass locally with my changes
  • Any dependent changes have been merged and published in downstream modules
  • I have checked my code and corrected any misspellings

Mentions:

List the person or team responsible for reviewing proposed changes.

cc @BranchMetrics/saas-sdk-devs for visibility.

If the qr codes get too big (in total file size), then the current function will blow up. This one works better, tested manually by updating the dist/build.js, and updating example.html to point to that instead of the production cdn hosted websdk
Copy link

@mack-branch mack-branch left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

nice catch, glad we could fix this. we probably should let it sit for a bit before deploying linkifier just to be safe.

Copy link
Contributor

@chrisyeagy-branch chrisyeagy-branch left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

im not sure why this fixes it, but i trust that you do.

@bredmond5 bredmond5 merged commit ccc8d89 into master Nov 4, 2024
7 checks passed
@bredmond5 bredmond5 mentioned this pull request Nov 5, 2024
15 tasks
bredmond5 added a commit that referenced this pull request Nov 5, 2024
# Pull Request Template

## Description

previous pr
#1075

I didnt understand that i was supposed to do this before, updated now

Fixes # (issue)

## Type of change

Please delete options that are not relevant.

- [ ] Bug fix (non-breaking change which fixes an issue)
- [ ] New feature (non-breaking change which adds functionality)
- [ ] Breaking change (fix or feature that would cause existing
functionality to not work as expected)
- [ ] This change requires a documentation update

## How Has This Been Tested?

Please describe the tests that you ran to verify your changes. Provide
instructions so we can reproduce. Please also list any relevant details
for your test configuration

- [ ] Unit test
- [ ] Integration test

## JS Budget Check

Please mention the size in kb before abd after this PR

| Files            | Before      | After       | 
| -----------      | ----------- | ----------- |
| dist/build.js.   |             |             |
| dist/build.min.js|             |             |

## Checklist:

- [ ] My code follows the style guidelines of this project
- [ ] I have performed a self-review of my own code
- [ ] I have commented my code, particularly in hard-to-understand areas
- [ ] I have made corresponding changes to the documentation
- [ ] My changes generate no new warnings
- [ ] I have added tests that prove my fix is effective or that my
feature works
- [ ] New and existing unit tests pass locally with my changes
- [ ] Any dependent changes have been merged and published in downstream
modules
- [ ] I have checked my code and corrected any misspellings

## Mentions: 
List the person or team responsible for reviewing proposed changes.

cc @BranchMetrics/saas-sdk-devs for visibility.
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants