Adding other coverage tests

[robertandremitchell]

Description

Small touch ups still needed for utils, augmentation. Should get us to 100% coverage in everything but data_curation, which I have not really worked on before, so a little cautious about taking that on: https://app.codecov.io/gh/CDCgov/dibbs-text-to-code/tree/rob%2Fcoverage-touchups/packages

Related Issues

Closes #[Link any related issues or tasks from your project management system.]

Additional Notes

[Add any additional context or notes that reviewers should know about.]

<--------------------- REMOVE THE LINES BELOW BEFORE MERGING --------------------->

Checklist

Please review and complete the following checklist before submitting your pull request:

• I have ensured that the pull request is of a manageable size, allowing it to be reviewed within a single session.
• I have reviewed my changes to ensure they are clear, concise, and well-documented.
• I have updated the documentation, if applicable.
• I have added or updated test cases to cover my changes, if applicable.
• I have minimized the number of reviewers to include only those essential for the review.

Checklist for Reviewers

Please review and complete the following checklist during the review process:

• The code follows best practices and conventions.
• The changes implement the desired functionality or fix the reported issue.
• The tests cover the new changes and pass successfully.
• Any potential edge cases or error scenarios have been considered.

[codecov-commenter]

Codecov Report

✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests.
✅ Project coverage is 95.74%. Comparing base (cba0d48) to head (19abceb).

Additional details and impacted files

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main     #423      +/-   ##
==========================================
+ Coverage   95.27%   95.74%   +0.46%     
==========================================
  Files          42       42              
  Lines        2161     2161              
==========================================
+ Hits         2059     2069      +10     
+ Misses        102       92      -10     

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:

• ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.
• 📦 JS Bundle Analysis: Save yourself from yourself by tracking and limiting bundle sizes in JS merges.

[nickclyde]

Good stuff! Just one suggestion below

[nickclyde]

The test name says "when missing" but BASIC_ECR already has assigningAuthorityName="original-document" on the <id> element, so this is actually testing the attribute-already-present path. The test at line 146 (test_get_old_document_id_sets_assigning_authority_name_when_missing_attribute) is the one that truly tests the missing case.

Suggested rename: test_get_old_document_id_preserves_assigning_authority_name_when_present.