chore(eslint): fix callback literal violations

[BridgeAR]

Summary

Use semantic names for response, hook, and batch-observer callbacks now rejected by n/no-callback-literal. Keep a scoped suppression for the gRPC test that deliberately passes a plain object through an error-first callback.

[dd-octo-sts]

Overall package size

Self size: 7.98 MB
Deduped: 8.64 MB
No deduping: 8.64 MB

Dependency sizes

| name | version | self size | total size | |------|---------|-----------|------------| | import-in-the-middle | 3.3.3 | 125.43 kB | 441.68 kB | | opentracing | 0.14.7 | 194.81 kB | 194.81 kB | | dc-polyfill | 0.1.11 | 25.74 kB | 25.74 kB |

_{🤖 This report was automatically generated by heaviest-objects-in-the-universe}

[datadog-prod-us1-3]

🎉 All green!

🧪 All tests passed
❄️ No new flaky tests detected

🎯 Code Coverage (details)
• Patch Coverage: 100.00%
• Overall Coverage: 98.56% (+0.00%)

_{This comment will be updated automatically if new data arrives.
🔗 Commit SHA: 34b7f0c | Docs | Datadog PR Page | Give us feedback!}

[pr-commenter]

Benchmarks

Benchmark execution time: 2026-08-07 21:27:12

Comparing candidate commit 34b7f0c in PR branch BridgeAR/2026-08-05-eslint-callback-literals with baseline commit d820eae in branch master.

📊 Benchmarking dashboard

Found 0 performance improvements and 0 performance regressions! Performance is the same for 2319 metrics, 39 unstable metrics.

Explanation

This is an A/B test comparing a candidate commit's performance against that of a baseline commit. Performance changes are noted in the tables below as:

• 🟩 = significantly better candidate vs. baseline
• 🟥 = significantly worse candidate vs. baseline

We compute a confidence interval (CI) over the relative difference of means between metrics from the candidate and baseline commits, considering the baseline as the reference.

If the CI is entirely outside the configured SIGNIFICANT_IMPACT_THRESHOLD (or the deprecated UNCONFIDENCE_THRESHOLD), the change is considered significant.

Feel free to reach out to #apm-benchmarking-platform on Slack if you have any questions.

More details about the CI and significant changes

You can imagine this CI as a range of values that is likely to contain the true difference of means between the candidate and baseline commits.

CIs of the difference of means are often centered around 0%, because often changes are not that big:

---------------------------------(------|---^--------)-------------------------------->
                              -0.6%    0%  0.3%     +1.2%
                                 |          |        |
         lower bound of the CI --'          |        |
sample mean (center of the CI) -------------'        |
         upper bound of the CI ----------------------'

As described above, a change is considered significant if the CI is entirely outside the configured SIGNIFICANT_IMPACT_THRESHOLD (or the deprecated UNCONFIDENCE_THRESHOLD).

For instance, for an execution time metric, this confidence interval indicates a significantly worse performance:

----------------------------------------|---------|---(---------^---------)---------->
                                       0%        1%  1.3%      2.2%      3.1%
                                                  |   |         |         |
       significant impact threshold --------------'   |         |         |
                      lower bound of CI --------------'         |         |
       sample mean (center of the CI) --------------------------'         |
                      upper bound of CI ----------------------------------'

Unstable benchmarks

These benchmarks have a confidence interval too wide to call a change; treat them as noise rather than signal.

scenario:appsec-appsec-enabled-24

• unstable execution_time [-204.177ms; +201.089ms] or [-7.582%; +7.467%]

scenario:appsec-appsec-enabled-26

• unstable execution_time [-226.133ms; +167.054ms] or [-8.804%; +6.504%]

scenario:appsec-appsec-enabled-with-attacks-24

• unstable execution_time [-162731.840µs; +161307.274µs] or [-5.220%; +5.174%]

scenario:appsec-appsec-enabled-with-attacks-26

• unstable execution_time [-189.214ms; +186.310ms] or [-6.437%; +6.338%]

scenario:appsec-control-20

• unstable execution_time [-132.972ms; +119.698ms] or [-7.986%; +7.189%]

scenario:appsec-control-24

• unstable execution_time [-116624.206µs; +118216.439µs] or [-9.307%; +9.434%]

scenario:appsec-control-26

• unstable execution_time [-124.720ms; +131.402ms] or [-9.957%; +10.491%]

scenario:appsec-iast-no-vulnerability-control-20

• unstable execution_time [-11.413ms; +14.628ms] or [-4.422%; +5.668%]

scenario:appsec-iast-no-vulnerability-iast-enabled-always-active-20

• unstable execution_time [-16907.130µs; +15779.797µs] or [-6.462%; +6.031%]

scenario:appsec-iast-no-vulnerability-iast-enabled-default-config-20

• unstable execution_time [-17571.528µs; +17023.726µs] or [-6.870%; +6.655%]

scenario:debugger-line-probe-with-snapshot-minimal-26

• unstable cpu_user_time [-4683.782ms; +3119.320ms] or [-42.194%; +28.101%]
• unstable execution_time [-4814.771ms; +3198.193ms] or [-40.686%; +27.025%]
• unstable instructions [-41.3G instructions; +27.4G instructions] or [-44.190%; +29.357%]
• unstable max_rss_usage [-16.094MB; +10.052MB] or [-9.819%; +6.133%]
• unstable throughput [-613.064op/s; +946.269op/s] or [-20.899%; +32.258%]

scenario:debugger-line-probe-without-snapshot-26

• unstable cpu_user_time [-2670.877ms; +4209.187ms] or [-27.994%; +44.117%]
• unstable execution_time [-2658.455ms; +4180.817ms] or [-25.902%; +40.734%]
• unstable instructions [-23.6G instructions; +37.4G instructions] or [-29.671%; +46.991%]
• unstable max_rss_usage [-9.283MB; +14.551MB] or [-5.887%; +9.228%]
• unstable throughput [-818.425op/s; +525.360op/s] or [-25.328%; +16.258%]

scenario:dogstatsd-aggregated-26

• unstable cpu_user_time [-68.183ms; +111.962ms] or [-6.808%; +11.179%]
• unstable execution_time [-65.657ms; +115.253ms] or [-6.474%; +11.365%]
• unstable throughput [-1206843.661op/s; +655364.088op/s] or [-8.044%; +4.368%]

scenario:dogstatsd-with-tags-20

• unstable cpu_user_time [-271.041ms; +319.864ms] or [-5.441%; +6.421%]
• unstable execution_time [-273.013ms; +319.973ms] or [-5.405%; +6.334%]
• unstable throughput [-113388.331op/s; +97466.138op/s] or [-6.838%; +5.878%]

scenario:plugin-claude-agent-sdk-compact-stream-scan-24

• unstable cpu_usage_percentage [-5.611%; +6.469%]
• unstable execution_time [-2695.977µs; +3985.311µs] or [-4.139%; +6.118%]
• unstable throughput [-33097.075op/s; +24782.146op/s] or [-6.210%; +4.650%]

scenario:plugin-graphql-long-with-depth-and-collapse-off-20

• unstable max_rss_usage [-28330.152KB; +29258.552KB] or [-7.147%; +7.381%]

scenario:plugin-graphql-long-with-depth-off-20

• unstable max_rss_usage [-5687.466KB; +7356.037KB] or [-4.440%; +5.743%]

scenario:plugin-graphql-long-with-depth-off-26

• unstable max_rss_usage [-35.713MB; +14.939MB] or [-19.817%; +8.290%]

scenario:plugin-graphql-long-with-depth-on-max-20

• unstable cpu_user_time [-588.547ms; +595.802ms] or [-5.093%; +5.155%]
• unstable execution_time [-599.538ms; +608.189ms] or [-5.085%; +5.159%]
• unstable throughput [-3.538op/s; +3.503op/s] or [-5.185%; +5.132%]

scenario:plugin-pg-service-26

• unstable cpu_usage_percentage [-7.162%; +3.883%]
• unstable execution_time [-46.525ms; +83.930ms] or [-5.222%; +9.420%]
• unstable throughput [-521561.478op/s; +283189.200op/s] or [-7.642%; +4.149%]

scenario:test-optimization-large-suite-20

• unstable max_rss_usage [-2.852MB; +10.983MB] or [-3.505%; +13.497%]

[codecov]

Codecov Report

✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests.
✅ Project coverage is 98.55%. Comparing base (d820eae) to head (34b7f0c).

Additional details and impacted files

@@           Coverage Diff            @@
##           master    #9694    +/-   ##
========================================
  Coverage   98.55%   98.55%            
========================================
  Files         966      966            
  Lines      139382   139382            
  Branches    12051    12202   +151     
========================================
+ Hits       137369   137370     +1     
+ Misses       2013     2012     -1     

Flag	Coverage Δ
aiguard	56.94% <ø> (-0.03%)	⬇️
aiguard-integration	55.87% <ø> (ø)
apm-bucket-0	57.18% <ø> (-0.03%)	⬇️
apm-bucket-1	63.32% <ø> (-0.02%)	⬇️
apm-bucket-2	62.17% <ø> (-0.03%)	⬇️
apm-bucket-3	59.76% <ø> (-0.03%)	⬇️
apm-capabilities-tracing	62.31% <ø> (ø)
apm-integrations-aerospike	56.23% <ø> (-0.03%)	⬇️
apm-integrations-confluentinc-kafka-javascript	61.15% <ø> (-0.03%)	⬇️
apm-integrations-couchbase	56.67% <ø> (-0.03%)	⬇️
apm-integrations-http	61.86% <ø> (-0.02%)	⬇️
apm-integrations-kafkajs	61.67% <ø> (-0.03%)	⬇️
apm-integrations-next	59.36% <ø> (-0.03%)	⬇️
apm-integrations-prisma	58.48% <ø> (-0.02%)	⬇️
appsec	72.10% <ø> (-0.02%)	⬇️
appsec-express_fastify_graphql	69.41% <ø> (-0.02%)	⬇️
appsec-integration	50.17% <ø> (ø)
appsec-kafka_ldapjs_lodash	63.38% <ø> (-0.02%)	⬇️
appsec-mongodb-core_mongoose_mysql	66.85% <ø> (-0.02%)	⬇️
appsec-next	56.63% <ø> (-0.02%)	⬇️
appsec-node-serialize_passport_postgres	66.26% <ø> (-0.02%)	⬇️
appsec-sourcing_stripe_template	64.69% <ø> (-0.02%)	⬇️
debugger	64.20% <ø> (-0.04%)	⬇️
instrumentations-bucket-0	51.66% <ø> (-0.03%)	⬇️
instrumentations-bucket-1	59.36% <ø> (-0.03%)	⬇️
instrumentations-bucket-10	60.84% <ø> (-0.02%)	⬇️
instrumentations-bucket-11	61.57% <ø> (-0.02%)	⬇️
instrumentations-bucket-12	51.67% <ø> (-0.03%)	⬇️
instrumentations-bucket-13	52.41% <ø> (-0.03%)	⬇️
instrumentations-bucket-14	51.62% <ø> (-0.03%)	⬇️
instrumentations-bucket-2	53.11% <ø> (-0.03%)	⬇️
instrumentations-bucket-3	53.46% <ø> (-0.03%)	⬇️
instrumentations-bucket-4	58.72% <ø> (-0.03%)	⬇️
instrumentations-bucket-5	50.28% <ø> (-0.02%)	⬇️
instrumentations-bucket-6	60.46% <ø> (-0.03%)	⬇️
instrumentations-bucket-7	58.06% <ø> (-0.03%)	⬇️
instrumentations-bucket-8	59.05% <ø> (-0.02%)	⬇️
instrumentations-bucket-9	57.40% <ø> (-0.03%)	⬇️
instrumentations-instrumentation-couchbase	50.92% <ø> (-0.03%)	⬇️
instrumentations-integration-esbuild	34.23% <ø> (ø)
llmobs-ai_anthropic_bedrock	62.81% <ø> (-0.02%)	⬇️
llmobs-bucket-1	61.31% <ø> (-0.02%)	⬇️
llmobs-openai	61.71% <ø> (-0.02%)	⬇️
llmobs-openai-agents_vertex-ai	59.99% <ø> (-0.03%)	⬇️
llmobs-sdk	66.75% <ø> (-0.03%)	⬇️
master-coverage	98.55% <ø> (?)
openfeature	55.67% <ø> (ø)
openfeature-unit	53.19% <ø> (-0.03%)	⬇️
platform-core_esbuild_instrumentations-misc	41.23% <ø> (-0.02%)	⬇️
platform-integration	60.41% <ø> (ø)
platform-shimmer_unit-guardrails_webpack	38.89% <ø> (-0.02%)	⬇️
plugins-bucket-0	56.89% <ø> (-0.02%)	⬇️
plugins-bucket-1	54.01% <ø> (ø)
plugins-bucket-11	61.43% <ø> (-0.03%)	⬇️
plugins-bucket-17	61.26% <ø> (-0.03%)	⬇️
plugins-bucket-18	61.89% <ø> (-0.02%)	⬇️
plugins-bucket-19	61.27% <ø> (-0.03%)	⬇️
plugins-bucket-20	63.69% <ø> (-0.03%)	⬇️
plugins-bucket-4	58.27% <ø> (-0.03%)	⬇️
plugins-bullmq_cassandra_cookie	61.34% <ø> (-0.03%)	⬇️
plugins-cookie-parser_crypto_dd-trace-api	56.31% <ø> (-0.03%)	⬇️
plugins-fetch_fs_generic-pool	58.22% <ø> (-0.03%)	⬇️
plugins-google-cloud-pubsub_grpc_handlebars	64.12% <ø> (-0.02%)	⬇️
plugins-hapi_hono_ioredis	59.86% <ø> (-0.03%)	⬇️
plugins-knex_langgraph_ldapjs	55.03% <ø> (-0.03%)	⬇️
plugins-light-my-request_limitd-client_lodash	58.34% <ø> (-0.03%)	⬇️
plugins-mariadb_memcached_mercurius	61.26% <ø> (-0.02%)	⬇️
plugins-mongodb_mongodb-core_mongoose	59.22% <ø> (-0.03%)	⬇️
plugins-multer_mysql_mysql2	58.81% <ø> (-0.03%)	⬇️
plugins-nats_node-serialize_opensearch	60.36% <ø> (-0.03%)	⬇️
plugins-passport-http_pino_postgres	58.55% <ø> (-0.03%)	⬇️
plugins-process_pug_redis	57.35% <ø> (-0.03%)	⬇️
plugins-undici_url_valkey	57.99% <ø> (-0.03%)	⬇️
plugins-vm_winston_ws	59.56% <ø> (-0.03%)	⬇️
profiling	61.47% <ø> (-0.03%)	⬇️
serverless-aws-sdk-aws-sdk	55.09% <ø> (-0.02%)	⬇️
serverless-aws-sdk-base-inject-field	50.89% <ø> (-0.03%)	⬇️
serverless-aws-sdk-bedrockruntime	54.62% <ø> (-0.02%)	⬇️
serverless-aws-sdk-client	56.18% <ø> (-0.03%)	⬇️
serverless-aws-sdk-dynamodb	55.46% <ø> (-0.03%)	⬇️
serverless-aws-sdk-eventbridge	49.69% <ø> (-0.02%)	⬇️
serverless-aws-sdk-kinesis	59.04% <ø> (-0.02%)	⬇️
serverless-aws-sdk-lambda	57.20% <ø> (-0.02%)	⬇️
serverless-aws-sdk-s3	55.55% <ø> (-0.02%)	⬇️
serverless-aws-sdk-serverless-peer-service	59.30% <ø> (-0.02%)	⬇️
serverless-aws-sdk-sns	59.85% <ø> (-0.02%)	⬇️
serverless-aws-sdk-sqs	60.27% <ø> (-0.02%)	⬇️
serverless-aws-sdk-stepfunctions	55.38% <ø> (-0.02%)	⬇️
serverless-aws-sdk-util	51.43% <ø> (-0.03%)	⬇️
serverless-bucket-0	54.06% <ø> (ø)
serverless-bucket-1	58.82% <ø> (-0.03%)	⬇️
test-optimization-cucumber	71.01% <ø> (-0.03%)	⬇️
test-optimization-cypress	64.85% <ø> (+0.10%)	⬆️
test-optimization-jest	72.42% <ø> (-0.01%)	⬇️
test-optimization-mocha	72.09% <ø> (+0.05%)	⬆️
test-optimization-playwright-playwright-atr	59.88% <ø> (+0.01%)	⬆️
test-optimization-playwright-playwright-efd	60.01% <ø> (+0.01%)	⬆️
test-optimization-playwright-playwright-final-status	60.25% <ø> (+0.08%)	⬆️
test-optimization-playwright-playwright-impacted-tests	59.72% <ø> (+0.16%)	⬆️
test-optimization-playwright-playwright-reporting	60.88% <ø> (-0.09%)	⬇️
test-optimization-playwright-playwright-test-management	60.70% <ø> (-0.09%)	⬇️
test-optimization-playwright-playwright-test-span	59.93% <ø> (-0.05%)	⬇️
test-optimization-selenium	59.07% <ø> (-0.13%)	⬇️
test-optimization-testopt	57.61% <ø> (+0.07%)	⬆️
test-optimization-vitest	73.30% <ø> (+0.05%)	⬆️
test-optimization-vitest-browser	58.95% <ø> (+0.01%)	⬆️
test-optimization-webdriverio	65.43% <ø> (+0.05%)	⬆️

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

☔ View full report in Codecov by Harness.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:

• ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.
• 📦 JS Bundle Analysis: Save yourself from yourself by tracking and limiting bundle sizes in JS merges.