Skip to content

Add iOS In-App Provisioning #59712

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged

Conversation

Skalakid
Copy link
Contributor

@Skalakid Skalakid commented Apr 7, 2025

Explanation of Change

This is a react-native-wallet testing PR for iOS for Expensify App. Some of the In-App Provisioning features are available only on production (on the signed app), so we hid them behind the wallet beta, and we will verify if everything works on production. After that, we will publish the library to npm and change the tgz local module for the one from npm

Important

This PR adds an In-App Provisioning feature for iOS only, the Android will be added in the separate PR

Note

The feature is hidden behind the special beta flag, so we can test it properly before launching it for everybody

Fixed Issues

$ #36957
PROPOSAL:

Tests

Note

To be able to test and use In-App Provisioning you need to use physical iOS device on signed app

  1. Open the app
  2. Go to Settings > Wallet
  3. Select any card
  4. Verify if the Add to Apple Wallet button is available
  5. Press it
  6. Verify user details in the form and card title at the top ("<Card title>" will be available in Wallet)
  7. Press Cancel and verify if no error appears and the native modal hides
  8. Press Add to Apple Wallet again
  9. Press Nest at the top right corner
  10. Verify if the card is successfully added to the wallet
  11. Verify if the Add to Apple Wallet button isn't visible on the page when the specified card is already in the wallet. On dev build Could Not Add Card alert appears at the end. On prod everything should be fine
  • Verify that no errors appear in the JS console

Offline tests

QA Steps

Same as Tests

  • Verify that no errors appear in the JS console

PR Author Checklist

  • I linked the correct issue in the ### Fixed Issues section above
  • I wrote clear testing steps that cover the changes made in this PR
    • I added steps for local testing in the Tests section
    • I added steps for the expected offline behavior in the Offline steps section
    • I added steps for Staging and/or Production testing in the QA steps section
    • I added steps to cover failure scenarios (i.e. verify an input displays the correct error message if the entered data is not correct)
    • I turned off my network connection and tested it while offline to ensure it matches the expected behavior (i.e. verify the default avatar icon is displayed if app is offline)
    • I tested this PR with a High Traffic account against the staging or production API to ensure there are no regressions (e.g. long loading states that impact usability).
  • I included screenshots or videos for tests on all platforms
  • I ran the tests on all platforms & verified they passed on:
    • Android: Native
    • Android: mWeb Chrome
    • iOS: Native
    • iOS: mWeb Safari
    • MacOS: Chrome / Safari
    • MacOS: Desktop
  • I verified there are no console errors (if there's a console error not related to the PR, report it or open an issue for it to be fixed)
  • I followed proper code patterns (see Reviewing the code)
    • I verified that any callback methods that were added or modified are named for what the method does and never what callback they handle (i.e. toggleReport and not onIconClick)
    • I verified that comments were added to code that is not self explanatory
    • I verified that any new or modified comments were clear, correct English, and explained "why" the code was doing something instead of only explaining "what" the code was doing.
    • I verified any copy / text shown in the product is localized by adding it to src/languages/* files and using the translation method
      • If any non-english text was added/modified, I used JaimeGPT to get English > Spanish translation. I then posted it in #expensify-open-source and it was approved by an internal Expensify engineer. Link to Slack message:
    • I verified all numbers, amounts, dates and phone numbers shown in the product are using the localization methods
    • I verified any copy / text that was added to the app is grammatically correct in English. It adheres to proper capitalization guidelines (note: only the first word of header/labels should be capitalized), and is either coming verbatim from figma or has been approved by marketing (in order to get marketing approval, ask the Bug Zero team member to add the Waiting for copy label to the issue)
    • I verified proper file naming conventions were followed for any new files or renamed files. All non-platform specific files are named after what they export and are not named "index.js". All platform-specific files are named for the platform the code supports as outlined in the README.
    • I verified the JSDocs style guidelines (in STYLE.md) were followed
  • If a new code pattern is added I verified it was agreed to be used by multiple Expensify engineers
  • I followed the guidelines as stated in the Review Guidelines
  • I tested other components that can be impacted by my changes (i.e. if the PR modifies a shared library or component like Avatar, I verified the components using Avatar are working as expected)
  • I verified all code is DRY (the PR doesn't include any logic written more than once, with the exception of tests)
  • I verified any variables that can be defined as constants (ie. in CONST.ts or at the top of the file that uses the constant) are defined as such
  • I verified that if a function's arguments changed that all usages have also been updated correctly
  • If any new file was added I verified that:
    • The file has a description of what it does and/or why is needed at the top of the file if the code is not self explanatory
  • If a new CSS style is added I verified that:
    • A similar style doesn't already exist
    • The style can't be created with an existing StyleUtils function (i.e. StyleUtils.getBackgroundAndBorderStyle(theme.componentBG))
  • If the PR modifies code that runs when editing or sending messages, I tested and verified there is no unexpected behavior for all supported markdown - URLs, single line code, code blocks, quotes, headings, bold, strikethrough, and italic.
  • If the PR modifies a generic component, I tested and verified that those changes do not break usages of that component in the rest of the App (i.e. if a shared library or component like Avatar is modified, I verified that Avatar is working as expected in all cases)
  • If the PR modifies a component related to any of the existing Storybook stories, I tested and verified all stories for that component are still working as expected.
  • If the PR modifies a component or page that can be accessed by a direct deeplink, I verified that the code functions as expected when the deeplink is used - from a logged in and logged out account.
  • If the PR modifies the UI (e.g. new buttons, new UI components, changing the padding/spacing/sizing, moving components, etc) or modifies the form input styles:
    • I verified that all the inputs inside a form are aligned with each other.
    • I added Design label and/or tagged @Expensify/design so the design team can review the changes.
  • If a new page is added, I verified it's using the ScrollView component to make it scrollable when more elements are added to the page.
  • I added unit tests for any new feature or bug fix in this PR to help automatically prevent regressions in this user flow.
  • If the main branch was merged into this PR after a review, I tested again and verified the outcome was still expected according to the Test steps.

Screenshots/Videos

Android: Native
android.mov
Android: mWeb Chrome
chrome.mov
iOS: Native
ios_phyiscal.MP4
iOS: mWeb Safari
safari.mov
MacOS: Chrome / Safari
web.mov
MacOS: Desktop
desktop.mov

Copy link
Contributor

github-actions bot commented Apr 7, 2025

⚠️ This PR is possibly changing native code and/or updating libraries, it may cause problems with HybridApp. Please check if any patch updates are required in the HybridApp repo and run an AdHoc build to verify that HybridApp will not break. Ask Contributor Plus for help if you are not sure how to handle this. ⚠️

Copy link
Contributor

github-actions bot commented Apr 7, 2025

⚠️ This PR is possibly changing native code and/or updating libraries, it may cause problems with HybridApp. Please check if any patch updates are required in the HybridApp repo and run an AdHoc build to verify that HybridApp will not break. Ask Contributor Plus for help if you are not sure how to handle this. ⚠️

Copy link
Contributor

github-actions bot commented Apr 7, 2025

⚠️ This PR is possibly changing native code and/or updating libraries, it may cause problems with HybridApp. Please check if any patch updates are required in the HybridApp repo and run an AdHoc build to verify that HybridApp will not break. Ask Contributor Plus for help if you are not sure how to handle this. ⚠️

@Skalakid Skalakid changed the title Add In-App Provisioning on iOS Add iOS In-App Provisioning Apr 7, 2025
Copy link
Contributor

github-actions bot commented Apr 7, 2025

⚠️ This PR is possibly changing native code and/or updating libraries, it may cause problems with HybridApp. Please check if any patch updates are required in the HybridApp repo and run an AdHoc build to verify that HybridApp will not break. Ask Contributor Plus for help if you are not sure how to handle this. ⚠️

Copy link
Contributor

github-actions bot commented Apr 8, 2025

🚧 @mountiny has triggered a test app build. You can view the workflow run here.

This comment has been minimized.

Comment on lines +4 to +5
// stringified {"certificates": string[]}
certificates: string;
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Is this comment indicating it looks like this?

"['cert1', 'cert2']"

Copy link
Contributor Author

@Skalakid Skalakid Apr 9, 2025

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

No, it's more like a result of this: JSON.stringify({"certificates": ['cert1', 'cert2']}). That's how it works on the OldDot 😅 I think we can change this later on the backend to just ['cert1', 'cert2']. What do you think about it?

import {checkIfWalletIsAvailable, handleAddCardToWallet, isCardInWallet} from '..';
import type AddToWalletButtonProps from './types';

function RNAddToWalletButton({card, cardHolderName, buttonStyle}: AddToWalletButtonProps) {
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

probably interferes with the import, but perhaps we could alias the import as import { AddToWalletButton as RNWAddToWalletButton }?

})
.catch((e) => {
Log.warn(`isCardInWallet error: ${e}`);
return Promise.resolve(card.state === 6);
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

What is this card.state === 6 represent?

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

It represents EXPENSIFY_CARD.STATE.CLOSED, but I think it's not appropriate here so I will change it to just false

Comment on lines +13 to +15
function isCardInWallet(_card: Card) {
// Return true for other platforms, so the AddToWalletButton is always hidden
return Promise.resolve(true);
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Is this necessary? It looks like src/libs/Wallet/RNAddToWalletButton/index.tsx already doesn't return the button so it shouldn't show up regardless

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

That's right but we wanted to secure the Wallet functions from using them on unsupported platforms like the web or desktop. It will prevent from bugs in the future and won't make the code platform-specific

Copy link
Contributor

github-actions bot commented Apr 9, 2025

🚧 @mountiny has triggered a test app build. You can view the workflow run here.

Copy link
Contributor

github-actions bot commented Apr 9, 2025

🧪🧪 Use the links below to test this adhoc build on Android, iOS, Desktop, and Web. Happy testing! 🧪🧪

Android 🤖 iOS 🍎
Android 🤖🔄 iOS 🍎🔄
https://ad-hoc-expensify-cash.s3.amazonaws.com/android/59712-hybrid/index.html https://ad-hoc-expensify-cash.s3.amazonaws.com/ios/59712-hybrid/index.html
Android iOS
Desktop 💻 Web 🕸️
https://ad-hoc-expensify-cash.s3.amazonaws.com/desktop/59712/NewExpensify.dmg https://59712.pr-testing.expensify.com
Desktop Web

👀 View the workflow run that generated this build 👀

@mountiny
Copy link
Contributor

mountiny commented Apr 9, 2025

ScreenRecording_04-09-2025.14-11-52_1.mp4

ios looks good to me @brunovjk can complete the rest of testing and checklist

@brunovjk
Copy link
Contributor

brunovjk commented Apr 9, 2025

Reviewer Checklist

  • I have verified the author checklist is complete (all boxes are checked off).
  • I verified the correct issue is linked in the ### Fixed Issues section above
  • I verified testing steps are clear and they cover the changes made in this PR
    • I verified the steps for local testing are in the Tests section
    • I verified the steps for Staging and/or Production testing are in the QA steps section
    • I verified the steps cover any possible failure scenarios (i.e. verify an input displays the correct error message if the entered data is not correct)
    • I turned off my network connection and tested it while offline to ensure it matches the expected behavior (i.e. verify the default avatar icon is displayed if app is offline)
  • I checked that screenshots or videos are included for tests on all platforms
  • I included screenshots or videos for tests on all platforms
  • I verified that the composer does not automatically focus or open the keyboard on mobile unless explicitly intended. This includes checking that returning the app from the background does not unexpectedly open the keyboard.
  • I verified tests pass on all platforms & I tested again on:
    • Android: Native
    • Android: mWeb Chrome
    • iOS: Native
    • iOS: mWeb Safari
    • MacOS: Chrome / Safari
    • MacOS: Desktop
  • If there are any errors in the console that are unrelated to this PR, I either fixed them (preferred) or linked to where I reported them in Slack
  • I verified proper code patterns were followed (see Reviewing the code)
    • I verified that any callback methods that were added or modified are named for what the method does and never what callback they handle (i.e. toggleReport and not onIconClick).
    • I verified that comments were added to code that is not self explanatory
    • I verified that any new or modified comments were clear, correct English, and explained "why" the code was doing something instead of only explaining "what" the code was doing.
    • I verified any copy / text shown in the product is localized by adding it to src/languages/* files and using the translation method
    • I verified all numbers, amounts, dates and phone numbers shown in the product are using the localization methods
    • I verified any copy / text that was added to the app is grammatically correct in English. It adheres to proper capitalization guidelines (note: only the first word of header/labels should be capitalized), and is either coming verbatim from figma or has been approved by marketing (in order to get marketing approval, ask the Bug Zero team member to add the Waiting for copy label to the issue)
    • I verified proper file naming conventions were followed for any new files or renamed files. All non-platform specific files are named after what they export and are not named "index.js". All platform-specific files are named for the platform the code supports as outlined in the README.
    • I verified the JSDocs style guidelines (in STYLE.md) were followed
  • If a new code pattern is added I verified it was agreed to be used by multiple Expensify engineers
  • I verified that this PR follows the guidelines as stated in the Review Guidelines
  • I verified other components that can be impacted by these changes have been tested, and I retested again (i.e. if the PR modifies a shared library or component like Avatar, I verified the components using Avatar have been tested & I retested again)
  • I verified all code is DRY (the PR doesn't include any logic written more than once, with the exception of tests)
  • I verified any variables that can be defined as constants (ie. in CONST.ts or at the top of the file that uses the constant) are defined as such
  • If a new component is created I verified that:
    • A similar component doesn't exist in the codebase
    • All props are defined accurately and each prop has a /** comment above it */
    • The file is named correctly
    • The component has a clear name that is non-ambiguous and the purpose of the component can be inferred from the name alone
    • The only data being stored in the state is data necessary for rendering and nothing else
    • For Class Components, any internal methods passed to components event handlers are bound to this properly so there are no scoping issues (i.e. for onClick={this.submit} the method this.submit should be bound to this in the constructor)
    • Any internal methods bound to this are necessary to be bound (i.e. avoid this.submit = this.submit.bind(this); if this.submit is never passed to a component event handler like onClick)
    • All JSX used for rendering exists in the render method
    • The component has the minimum amount of code necessary for its purpose, and it is broken down into smaller components in order to separate concerns and functions
  • If any new file was added I verified that:
    • The file has a description of what it does and/or why is needed at the top of the file if the code is not self explanatory
  • If a new CSS style is added I verified that:
    • A similar style doesn't already exist
    • The style can't be created with an existing StyleUtils function (i.e. StyleUtils.getBackgroundAndBorderStyle(theme.componentBG)
  • If the PR modifies code that runs when editing or sending messages, I tested and verified there is no unexpected behavior for all supported markdown - URLs, single line code, code blocks, quotes, headings, bold, strikethrough, and italic.
  • If the PR modifies a generic component, I tested and verified that those changes do not break usages of that component in the rest of the App (i.e. if a shared library or component like Avatar is modified, I verified that Avatar is working as expected in all cases)
  • If the PR modifies a component related to any of the existing Storybook stories, I tested and verified all stories for that component are still working as expected.
  • If the PR modifies a component or page that can be accessed by a direct deeplink, I verified that the code functions as expected when the deeplink is used - from a logged in and logged out account.
  • If the PR modifies the UI (e.g. new buttons, new UI components, changing the padding/spacing/sizing, moving components, etc) or modifies the form input styles:
    • I verified that all the inputs inside a form are aligned with each other.
    • I added Design label and/or tagged @Expensify/design so the design team can review the changes.
  • If a new page is added, I verified it's using the ScrollView component to make it scrollable when more elements are added to the page.
  • For any bug fix or new feature in this PR, I verified that sufficient unit tests are included to prevent regressions in this flow.
  • If the main branch was merged into this PR after a review, I tested again and verified the outcome was still expected according to the Test steps.
  • I have checked off every checkbox in the PR reviewer checklist, including those that don't apply to this PR.

Screenshots/Videos

Android: Native
59712_android_native.mov
Android: mWeb Chrome
59712_android_web.mov
iOS: Native
iOS: mWeb Safari
59712_ios_web.mov
MacOS: Chrome / Safari
59712_web_safari.mov
MacOS: Desktop
59712_web_desktop.mov

Copy link
Contributor

@brunovjk brunovjk left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I couldn't test the "Add to Wallet Button" itself, because I don't have a physical iOS, but Vit did it here. I tested if the changes did not break anything in the app and LGTM

@melvin-bot melvin-bot bot requested a review from mountiny April 9, 2025 13:46
mountiny
mountiny previously approved these changes Apr 9, 2025
Copy link
Contributor

@mountiny mountiny left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Looks good to me, all yours @thienlnam

thienlnam
thienlnam previously approved these changes Apr 9, 2025
@Skalakid Skalakid dismissed stale reviews from thienlnam and mountiny via 7c2607b April 10, 2025 08:26
@mountiny mountiny merged commit a08e8f7 into Expensify:main Apr 10, 2025
24 checks passed
@OSBotify
Copy link
Contributor

✋ This PR was not deployed to staging yet because QA is ongoing. It will be automatically deployed to staging after the next production release.

Copy link
Contributor

🚀 Deployed to staging by https://github.com/mountiny in version: 9.1.27-0 🚀

platform result
🖥 desktop 🖥 success ✅
🕸 web 🕸 success ✅
🤖 android 🤖 success ✅
🍎 iOS 🍎 success ✅

Copy link
Contributor

🚀 Deployed to production by https://github.com/marcaaron in version: 9.1.28-15 🚀

platform result
🖥 desktop 🖥 success ✅
🕸 web 🕸 success ✅
🤖 android 🤖 failure ❌
🍎 iOS 🍎 success ✅

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
InternalQA This pull request required internal QA
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

7 participants