Autodesk: vt: fix the VtValueRef implicit casting that leads to unwanted casting. #3946
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Signed-off-by: Xichen Zhou <[email protected]>
Contributor
Author
|
Closing for now - requires some more investigation. |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
2 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Description of Change(s)
The detailed description is is described in Issue #3944 . In brief - the
VtValueRefimplicit constructor can leads to unexpected casting, especially on visual studio compilers. From our testing, this leads to a stack overflow problem.This PR fix the crash by converting the
VtValueRefimplicit constructor of any T an explicit constructor thus no unexpected cast can happen.Link to proposal (if applicable)
Fixes Issue(s)
Checklist
I have created this PR based on the dev branch
I have followed the coding conventions
I have added unit tests that exercise this functionality (Reference:
testing guidelines)
I have verified that all unit tests pass with the proposed changes
I have submitted a signed Contributor License Agreement (Reference:
Contributor License Agreement instructions)