Skip to content

Replace pandas date_range API with DatetimeIndex in tests #717

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Closed
arhamchopra wants to merge 1 commit into from
Closed

Replace pandas date_range API with DatetimeIndex in tests #717

Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
1 commit
Select commit
File filter

Filter by extension

Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
20 changes: 12 additions & 8 deletions csp/tests/adapters/test_parquet.py
View file
Open in desktop
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -205,11 +205,13 @@ def graph():
csp.run(graph, starttime=start_time)
df = pandas.read_parquet(filename)
expected_columns = {}
# pandas 3.0+: need to explicitly force ns unit and UTC tz, no longer the default
# Build the expected index explicitly rather than via pandas.date_range(...),
# which segfaults under pandas 3.0.4 + numpy<2.5 (tslibs offset ABI mismatch).
# This yields the same datetime64[ns, UTC] values.
if timestamp_column_name:
expected_columns[timestamp_column_name] = pandas.date_range(
start=start_time + timedelta(seconds=1), periods=10, unit="ns", freq="1s", tz="UTC"
)
expected_columns[timestamp_column_name] = pandas.DatetimeIndex(
[start_time + timedelta(seconds=i) for i in range(1, 11)]
).as_unit("ns")
expected_columns.update(
{
"x": list(range(1, 11)),
Expand Down Expand Up @@ -242,10 +244,12 @@ def graph():

expected_df = pandas.DataFrame.from_dict(
{
# pandas 3.0+: need to explicitly force ns unit and UTC tz, no longer the default
"timestamp": pandas.date_range(
start=start_time + timedelta(seconds=1), periods=10, unit="ns", freq="1s", tz="UTC"
),
# Build the expected index explicitly rather than via pandas.date_range(...),
# which segfaults under pandas 3.0.4 + numpy<2.5 (tslibs offset ABI mismatch).
# This yields the same datetime64[ns, UTC] values.
"timestamp": pandas.DatetimeIndex(
[start_time + timedelta(seconds=i) for i in range(1, 11)]
).as_unit("ns"),
"x": list(range(1, 11)),
"y": list(map(float, range(0, 100, 10))),
}
Expand Down
Loading