Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Added credit renewal info to Sales handbook #10598

Open
wants to merge 1 commit into
base: master
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

simfish85
Copy link
Contributor

Changes

Documented how we should approach different levels of credit expiry and rollover

Checklist

  • Words are spelled using American English
  • Titles are in sentence case
  • Feature names are in sentence case too
  • Use relative URLs for internal links
  • If I moved a page, I added a redirect in vercel.json
  • Remove this template if you're not going to fill it out!

Copy link

vercel bot commented Feb 7, 2025

The latest updates on your projects. Learn more about Vercel for Git ↗︎

Name Status Preview Updated (UTC)
posthog ✅ Ready (Inspect) Visit Preview Feb 7, 2025 9:58am

* If they will run out of credit or wish to buy more within the **first 6 months** of the contract term, they can still take advantage of their initial discount. You'll need to have them sign a new order form which adds the additional credit, and it should expire on the date of the original order form.
* Example: Their original order form was signed on 1st January with a 12-month term. Their expansion order form could be signed on 1st June with a 7-month term. Make sure the end date lines up with the end date of the original contract to avoid any issues with the billing server and ARR calculation.
* If they will run out of credit with **less than 2 months** remaining on their initial term, as long as they sign a renewal order form to start at the end of the original contract term we will cover their usage for free until the renewal date, assuming the renewal order form is signed before they run out of credit.
* If they fall **in between** the two cases above (running out of credit with <6 months and >2 months to go) then we need them to sign a new 12 month (or longer) order form lined up with their monthly billing date. This makes ARR calculation slightly trickier as there are two overlapping contracts in play at the same time.
Copy link
Contributor

@fraserhopper fraserhopper Feb 10, 2025

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Could we do something quite aggressive tactically here to lock them into a longer contract eg make the remainder of their initial contract at a bigger discount and then sign a new 12 month contract at an upgrade from initial terms. Just thinking that the longer they are tied down, the better it is for LTV, retention and locking out competitors.

Something like, we'll give you and extra 20% discount on the remainder of this term for more credits and your renewal rate is at an increase of the initial 12 months MRR. We might take a slight hit in MRR but that should increase for year 2 and we get 24 months in total?

Might not work out that good in reality as haven't had a look at the numbers.

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I like the concept. I'm new here, so it's hard for me to gauge renewal conversations and whether a company that has burned through credits would appreciate the additional discount and not balk at the longer term, or resent the longer term as they'd burned through their credits ahead of their existing term.

Would probably depend on how they burned through the credits. If inefficient usage, then angry.? If due to business growth, then interested (but isn't that where we'd want to hold margins and only grow with volume)? If else...?

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

So yeah I guess it's an alternative option, again I haven't gone through the in's and out's of the outcome but basically something along the lines of

Customer signs up for $50k deal ($75k credits) burns through them in 8 months, they have 4 months left we say - you need $25k credit for the rest of the 4 months, you can have them for $12.5k(50% discount) if you sign up to a new 12 month deal at the end of that period for $75k. So they pay us $12.5k now(net30) and $75k in 4 months(net30).

Short term bump on ARR for us and then a larger long term bump. We've also locked them in.

I guess the alternative is they sign up to a $75k deal for 12 months (or similar). Which we can obviously still offer them.

I don't know how customers would react to this in reference to them burning through credits efficiently/inefficiently.

The downside is we perhaps leave some money on the table but I think having customers locked in is a huge, huge win for us as we make the product more and more valuable over time.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants