-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 481
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Added credit renewal info to Sales handbook #10598
Open
simfish85
wants to merge
1
commit into
master
Choose a base branch
from
simfish85/renewals
base: master
Could not load branches
Branch not found: {{ refName }}
Loading
Could not load tags
Nothing to show
Loading
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Some commits from the old base branch may be removed from the timeline,
and old review comments may become outdated.
+18
−0
Open
Changes from all commits
Commits
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Could we do something quite aggressive tactically here to lock them into a longer contract eg make the remainder of their initial contract at a bigger discount and then sign a new 12 month contract at an upgrade from initial terms. Just thinking that the longer they are tied down, the better it is for LTV, retention and locking out competitors.
Something like, we'll give you and extra 20% discount on the remainder of this term for more credits and your renewal rate is at an increase of the initial 12 months MRR. We might take a slight hit in MRR but that should increase for year 2 and we get 24 months in total?
Might not work out that good in reality as haven't had a look at the numbers.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I like the concept. I'm new here, so it's hard for me to gauge renewal conversations and whether a company that has burned through credits would appreciate the additional discount and not balk at the longer term, or resent the longer term as they'd burned through their credits ahead of their existing term.
Would probably depend on how they burned through the credits. If inefficient usage, then angry.? If due to business growth, then interested (but isn't that where we'd want to hold margins and only grow with volume)? If else...?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
So yeah I guess it's an alternative option, again I haven't gone through the in's and out's of the outcome but basically something along the lines of
Customer signs up for $50k deal ($75k credits) burns through them in 8 months, they have 4 months left we say - you need $25k credit for the rest of the 4 months, you can have them for $12.5k(50% discount) if you sign up to a new 12 month deal at the end of that period for $75k. So they pay us $12.5k now(net30) and $75k in 4 months(net30).
Short term bump on ARR for us and then a larger long term bump. We've also locked them in.
I guess the alternative is they sign up to a $75k deal for 12 months (or similar). Which we can obviously still offer them.
I don't know how customers would react to this in reference to them burning through credits efficiently/inefficiently.
The downside is we perhaps leave some money on the table but I think having customers locked in is a huge, huge win for us as we make the product more and more valuable over time.