-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 47
Add more industry data #211
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Add more industry data #211
Conversation
Latest updates envisage:
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I tried to cross-check a few numbers with limited success. Could you help me and future us locate them?
We also need to avoid breaking changes from changing value e.g. for DRI HBI demand.
Could you also please merge with master
and rerun snakemake
, since there have been a few changes since the branch was created?
Thanks!
inputs/manual_input.csv
Outdated
@@ -371,6 +377,7 @@ bioethanol crops,fuel,2020,54.6434100368518,EUR/MWhth,2010,"JRC ENSPRESO ca avg | |||
bioethanol crops,fuel,2030,72.477665790641,EUR/MWhth,2010,"JRC ENSPRESO ca avg for MINBIOCRP11 (Bioethanol barley, wheat, grain maize, oats, other cereals and rye), ENS_BaU_GFTM", | |||
bioethanol crops,fuel,2040,75.7178710725453,EUR/MWhth,2010,"JRC ENSPRESO ca avg for MINBIOCRP11 (Bioethanol barley, wheat, grain maize, oats, other cereals and rye), ENS_BaU_GFTM", | |||
bioethanol crops,fuel,2050,78.995541440487,EUR/MWhth,2010,"JRC ENSPRESO ca avg for MINBIOCRP11 (Bioethanol barley, wheat, grain maize, oats, other cereals and rye), ENS_BaU_GFTM", | |||
bioethanol crops,CO2 intensity,2020,0.25704,tCO2/MWh_th,,"JRC, 01_JRC-EU-TIMES Full model, https://zenodo.org/records/3544900, file `Scen_EmisCO2.xls`). Original value 71.4 g CO2/MJ", |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
This value is based on the Well-to-Wheel numbers from the Excel, is that what you really wanted? Maybe add some more description what this means to avoid misinterpretation. E.g. It could also be the CO2 intensity of only the agricultural activity for bioethanol crops (not used for transport fuels).
- add the sheet name from where you got the number, so the next person doesn't have to search through the Excel file sheet by sheet ;)
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
bioethanol crops,CO2 intensity,2020,0.25704,tCO2/MWh_th,,"JRC, 01_JRC-EU-TIMES Full model, https://zenodo.org/records/3544900, file `Scen_EmisCO2.xls`). Original value 71.4 g CO2/MJ", | |
bioethanol crops,CO2 intensity,2020,0.25704,tCO2/MWh_th,,"JRC, 01_JRC-EU-TIMES Full model, https://zenodo.org/records/3544900, file `Scen_EmisCO2.xls`. Original value 71.4 g CO2/MJ", |
Surplus bracket ;)
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Thanks for the observation, @euronion ! Definitely an update is required here. I'm currently using the value obtained from the stoichiometric CO2 yield of ethanol fermentation, based on a lower heating value (LHV) of 26.7 MJ/kg to obtain the theoretically capturable biogenic CO2.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Shouldn't it be negative in that case? Since the bioethanol crops is absorbing the carbon, not emitting? Emissions happens where the energy service is provided.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Sure, in the implementation in PyPSA-Earth this CO2 intensity value is used to obtain the value of CO2_stored obtained from a CCS-equipped ethanol production plant (thus providing actual "negative" emissions), but it should be ok if it's positive here, as it is for all other carriers reporting a CO2 intensity.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
One more round. Information is ok-ish, I'm not sure on some entries. Let's blame the
the Excel files from TIMES are not nice to navigate :/
inputs/manual_input.csv
Outdated
@@ -371,6 +377,7 @@ bioethanol crops,fuel,2020,54.6434100368518,EUR/MWhth,2010,"JRC ENSPRESO ca avg | |||
bioethanol crops,fuel,2030,72.477665790641,EUR/MWhth,2010,"JRC ENSPRESO ca avg for MINBIOCRP11 (Bioethanol barley, wheat, grain maize, oats, other cereals and rye), ENS_BaU_GFTM", | |||
bioethanol crops,fuel,2040,75.7178710725453,EUR/MWhth,2010,"JRC ENSPRESO ca avg for MINBIOCRP11 (Bioethanol barley, wheat, grain maize, oats, other cereals and rye), ENS_BaU_GFTM", | |||
bioethanol crops,fuel,2050,78.995541440487,EUR/MWhth,2010,"JRC ENSPRESO ca avg for MINBIOCRP11 (Bioethanol barley, wheat, grain maize, oats, other cereals and rye), ENS_BaU_GFTM", | |||
bioethanol crops,CO2 intensity,2020,0.25704,tCO2/MWh_th,,"JRC, 01_JRC-EU-TIMES Full model, https://zenodo.org/records/3544900, file `Scen_EmisCO2.xls`). Original value 71.4 g CO2/MJ", |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Shouldn't it be negative in that case? Since the bioethanol crops is absorbing the carbon, not emitting? Emissions happens where the energy service is provided.
inputs/manual_input.csv
Outdated
cement dry clinker,gas-input,2020,1.9,MWh_NG/t_clinker,2020,"JRC, 01_JRC-EU-TIMES Full model, https://zenodo.org/records/3544900, file `SubRES_15_TECHS_CHP_SUP_IND.xlsx`, Sheet `IND` (ICMDRYPRD01, ICM.Dry Process Production.01)", | ||
cement dry clinker,electricity-input,2020,30,MWh_el/t_clinker,2020,"JRC, 01_JRC-EU-TIMES Full model, https://zenodo.org/records/3544900, file `SubRES_15_TECHS_CHP_SUP_IND.xlsx`, Sheet `IND` (ICMDRYPRD01, ICM.Dry Process Production.01)", |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I'm trying to understand the units for INDGAS
and INDELC
.
Also what does ICMPRC
and INDCOK
indicate?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
INDGAS
and INDELC
input should be in PJ/Mt (because all INDGAS
and INDELC
are in PJ and the output commodity MCMCLK
in Mt). You can retrieve the information regarding all the units related to all the commodities and technologies in the tables at the bottom of the same sheet where data are listed (let's blame again the Excel files from TIMES that are definitely not nice to navigate)
ICMPRC
is the Process cement heat
and INDCOK
is coke (but that's zero for dry clinker).
However, I'm having strong doubts now because I see the values in PJ/Mt don't match the values I put in the manual_input
file. I need further checks. Also, I'm missing the process heat input, and I don't really understand/remember the reason why
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
@euronion I checked again and made a few changes. My suspect is that there were some mistakes in fetching the right values from the Excel file but now everything should be fine. I also added heat input for dry clinker production, which was not taken into account before. For cement finishing, the source now is the Trans
file as it's mentioned as the used input source for values in the JRC model.
Co-authored-by: Johannes HAMPP <[email protected]>
Co-authored-by: Johannes HAMPP <[email protected]>
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Thanks a lot @danielelerede-oet .
We're slowly getting there! :)
Co-authored-by: Johannes HAMPP <[email protected]>
Co-authored-by: Johannes HAMPP <[email protected]>
outputs/costs_2020.csv
Outdated
Suited for Brazilian production, original value 501.0876 MEUR/GW INVCOST~2020; and | ||
Suited for Brazilian production, original value 454.9348 MEUR/GW INVCOST~2025; and | ||
Suited for Brazilian production, original value 421.9685 MEUR/GW INVCOST~2030",2015.0 | ||
ethanol from sugar crops,lifetime,20.0,years,"JRC, 01_JRC-EU-TIMES Full model, https://zenodo.org/records/3544900, file `SubRES_10_TECHS_CHP_SUP_IND.xlsx` and `SubRES_10_TECHS_CHP_SUP_IND_Trans.xlsx` (BCRPETH201, Ethanol production from sugar crops ) and currency year from file `SysSettings.xls`, sheet `Constants`, Attribute `G_Dyear` = 2015.",Suited for Brazilian production,2015.0 |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
There is some weirdness going on when the output files are created - this information should be in one line, not in dedicated lines.
This should be the last thing to fix (I hope)
@danielelerede-oet I've directly added and committed some info that I think we should also add for traceability, please check the latest commit. Also there is something wrong in the output Else looking good - as soon as my changes are deemed ok or adjusted and the |
Hi @euronion ! The bug in the output .csv files is due to line 2702 in |
Thanks @danielelerede-oet . I've removed the weird newline in the processing script, but I'll keep your shortened descriptions. Thanks for updating them! Looking good, proceeding to merge. Thanks a lot for this contribution! :) |
Changes proposed in this Pull Request
Checklist
doc
.environment.yaml
(if applicable).doc/release_notes.rst
of the upcoming release is included.