forked from electronicarts/CnC_Generals_Zero_Hour
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 67
Add CONTRIBUTING document #548
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Open
xezon
wants to merge
5
commits into
TheSuperHackers:main
Choose a base branch
from
xezon:xezon/add-contribute-doc
base: main
Could not load branches
Branch not found: {{ refName }}
Loading
Could not load tags
Nothing to show
Loading
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Some commits from the old base branch may be removed from the timeline,
and old review comments may become outdated.
Open
Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
5 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change |
---|---|---|
@@ -0,0 +1,143 @@ | ||
# How to contribute as a developer | ||
|
||
To contribute, fork this repository to create your own copy that you can clone locally and push back to. You can use your fork to create pull requests for your code to be merged into this repository. | ||
|
||
## Code guidelines | ||
|
||
### Scope of code changes | ||
|
||
Code edits only touch the lines of code that serve the intended goal of the change. Big refactors should not be combined with logical changes, because these can become very difficult to review. If a change requires a refactor, create a commit for the refactor before (or after) creating a commit for the change. A Pull Request can contain multiple commits and can be merged with **Rebase and Merge** if these commits are meant to be preserved on the main branch. Otherwise, method of merging will be **Squash and Merge**. | ||
|
||
### Style of code changes | ||
|
||
Code edits should fit the nearby code in ways that the code style reads consistent, unless the original code style is bad. The original game code uses c++98, or a deviation thereof, and is simple to read. Prefer not to use newer language features unless required to implement the desired change. Prefer to use newer language features when they are considerably more robust or make the code easier to understand or maintain. | ||
|
||
### Language style guide | ||
|
||
*Work in progress. Needs a maintainer. Can be built upon existing Code guidelines, such as the "Google C++ Style Guide".* | ||
|
||
### Precedence of code changes | ||
|
||
Changes to Zero Hour take precedence over Generals, if applicable. When the changed code is not shared by both titles, then the change needs to be created for Zero Hour first, and then recreated for Generals. The implementation of a change for both titles needs to be identical or as close as possible. Preferably the Generals replica of a change comes with the same Pull Request. The Generals replica can be created after the Zero Hour code review has finished. | ||
|
||
|
||
## Change documentation | ||
|
||
User facing changes need to be documented in code, Pull Requests and change logs. All documentation ideally is written in the present tense, and not the past. | ||
|
||
Good: | ||
|
||
> Fixes particle effect of USA Missile Defender | ||
|
||
Bad: | ||
|
||
> Fixed particle effect of USA Missile Defender | ||
|
||
When a text refers to a faction unit, structure, upgrade or similar, then the unit should be worded without any abbrevations and should be prefixed with the faction name. Valid faction names are USA, China, GLA, Boss, Civilian. Subfaction names can be appended too, for example GLA Stealth. | ||
|
||
Good: | ||
|
||
> Fixes particle effect of USA Missile Defender | ||
|
||
Bad: | ||
|
||
> Fixes particle effect of MD | ||
|
||
|
||
### Code documentation | ||
|
||
User facing changes need to be accompanied by comment(s) where the change is made. Maintenance related changes, such as compilation fixes, typically do not need commenting, unless the next reader can benefit from a special explanation. The comment can be put at the begin of the changed file, class, function or block. It must be clear from the change description what has changed. | ||
|
||
The expected comment format is | ||
|
||
``` | ||
// TheSuperHackers @keyword author DD/MM/YYYY A meaningful description for this change. | ||
``` | ||
|
||
The `TheSuperHackers` word and `@keyword` are mandatory. `author` and date can be omitted when preferred. | ||
|
||
| Keyword | Use-case | | ||
|------------------|-------------------------------------------------------------| | ||
| @bugfix | Fixes a bug | | ||
| @fix | Fixes something, but is not a user facing bug | | ||
| @compile | Addresses a compile warning or error | | ||
| @feature | Adds something new | | ||
| @performance | Improves performance | | ||
| @refactor | Moves or rewrites code, but does not change the behaviour | | ||
| @tweak | Changes values or settings | | ||
| @info | Writes useful information for the next reader | | ||
| @todo | Adds a note for something left to do if really necessary | | ||
|
||
Block comment sample | ||
|
||
``` | ||
// TheSuperHackers @bugfix JAJames 17/03/2025 Fix uninitialized memory access and add more Windows versions. | ||
memset(&os_info,0,sizeof(os_info)); | ||
``` | ||
|
||
Optionally, the pull request number can be appended to the comment. This can only be done after the pull request has been created. | ||
|
||
``` | ||
// TheSuperHackers @bugfix JAJames 17/03/2025 Fix uninitialized memory access and add more Windows versions. (#123) | ||
``` | ||
|
||
### Pull request documentation | ||
|
||
The title of a new Pull Request, and/or commit(s) within, begin with a **[GEN]** and/or **[ZH]** tag, depending on the game(s) it targets. If a change does not target a game, then a tag is not necessary. Furthermore, the title consists of a concise and descriptive sentence about the change and/or commit, beginning with an uppercase letter and ending without a dot. The title ideally begins with a word that describes the action that the change takes, for example `Fix *this*`, `Change *that*`, `Add *those*`, `Refactor *thing*`. | ||
|
||
Good: | ||
``` | ||
[GEN][ZH] Fix uninitialized memory access in Get_OS_Info | ||
``` | ||
|
||
Bad: | ||
``` | ||
Minimal changes for successful build. | ||
``` | ||
|
||
Currently established commit title tags are | ||
|
||
* [GEN] | ||
* [ZH] | ||
* [CORE] | ||
* [CMAKE] | ||
* [GITHUB] | ||
* [LINUX] | ||
|
||
If the Pull Request is meant to be merged with rebase, then a note for **Merge with Rebase** should be added to the top of the text body, to help identify the correct merge action when it is ready for merge. All commits of the Pull Request need to be properly named and need the number of the Pull Request added as a suffix in parentheses. Example: **(#333)**. All commits need to be able to compile on their own without dependencies in newer commits of the same Pull Request. Prefer to create changes for **Squash and Merge**, as this will simplify things. | ||
|
||
The text body begins with links to related issue report(s) and/or Pull Request(s) if applicable. | ||
|
||
To write a link use the following format: | ||
|
||
``` | ||
* Fixes #222 | ||
* Closes #333 | ||
* Relates to #555 | ||
* Follow up for #666 | ||
``` | ||
|
||
Links are commonly used for | ||
|
||
* closing a related issue report or task when this pull request is merged | ||
* closing another pull request when this pull request is merged | ||
|
||
Some keywords are interpreted by GitHub. Read about it [here](https://docs.github.com/en/issues/tracking-your-work-with-issues/linking-a-pull-request-to-an-issue). | ||
|
||
The text body continues with a description of the change in appropriate detail. This serves to educate reviewers and visitors to get a good understanding of the change without the need to study and understand the associated changed files. If the change is controversial or affects gameplay in a considerable way, then a rationale text needs to be appended. The rationale explains why the given change makes sense. | ||
|
||
|
||
### Pull request merging rules | ||
|
||
Please be mindful when merging changes. There are pitfalls in regards to the commit title consistency. | ||
|
||
When attempting to **Squash and Merge** a Pull Request that contains a single commit, then GitHub will default generate a commit title from that single commit. Typically this is undesired, when the new commit title is meant to be kept in sync with the Pull Request title rather than the Pull Request commit title. The generated commit title may need to be adjusted before merging the Pull Request. | ||
|
||
When attempting to **Squash and Merge** a Pull Request that contains multiple commits, the GitHub will default generate a commit title from the Pull Request title. Additionally it will generate a commit description from the multiple commits that are part of the Pull Request. The generated commit description generally needs to be cleared before merging the Pull Request to keep the commit title clean. | ||
|
||
When attempting to **Rebase and Merge** a Pull Request, then all commits will transfer with the same names to the main branch. Verify that all commit titles are properly crafted, with tags where applicable, trailing Pull Request numbers in parentheses and no unnecessary commit descriptions (texts below the commit title). | ||
|
||
|
||
### Change log documentation | ||
|
||
*Work in progress.* |
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Same as with the default "Squash and merge". I'd prefer putting this up to a vote. When using
Rebase and merge
PR numbers inside the commit message are a headacheThere was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I'm personally not a fan of adding the PR number to the commit messages or generally referring to github or this repo specific things in them as if cloned or forked they won't lead back to the relevant items at all and will end up meaningless. Referring to issues in PRs and PRs in issues is fine as they are (mostly) locked to the repo in question and won't be split from each other.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
This is a reasonable argument against this practice. feliwir is also not a fan of this. So do we prefer to not do that then and abandon this practice now? Note that "Squash and Merge" will automatically place this number into the commit title form. We would have to manually remove it before each "Squash and Merge".
Note that the link in the commit makes it easier to look up the Pull Request or find a textual change log entry that is identified with the pull request number. It also groups related commits together in the commit history. We would partly lose that.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I'm in favour of dropping the practice personally, I appreciate that it makes it easier to follow a commit back to the PR it was merged in, butfor me technical limitation that it only works while the repo is here in github and may point elsewhere unrelated when cloned or if ever moved is enough for me. The fact that its slightly onerous for multi commit PRs could be an acceptable tradeoff otherwise.