-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 4
Grading Rubric for Presentation
Jen Wilson edited this page Nov 5, 2024
·
1 revision
Rubric for Presentation (100 points, 35% of the final project grade)
| Category | Criteria | Points |
|---|---|---|
| Content | Quality and depth of research | 20 |
| Present a clear statement of an outstanding research question | ||
| Provides evidence and reference to the scientific literature to support the key points | ||
| Present an AI-ready data set and preliminary analysis. | ||
| Demonstrate a classic machine learning example. | ||
| Demonstrates a deep learning example | ||
| Discuss the computational time for training and deploying | ||
| Discuss the appropriateness of computational resources needed | ||
| Structure and Organization | Coherence and flow of the presentation | 15 |
| Logical structure (report and presentation: intro, body, conclusion; software: readme, env file, src/, data/, plots/,...) | ||
| Key points are clearly distinguished and emphasized | ||
| Clarity and Delivery | Effectiveness in communicating ideas | 20 |
| Clear articulation and pronunciation | ||
| Adequate volume and pace | ||
| Minimal reliance on notes, maintaining eye contact with the audience | ||
| Confident and professional demeanor | ||
| Visual Aids | Effectiveness of any supporting visual materials (slides, charts, plots) | 10 |
| Visual aids enhance, not distract, from the presentation | ||
| Information is presented clearly, is easy to follow, and uses appropriate design principles | ||
| Slides do not overwhelm with text or complex visuals | ||
| Engagement and Interaction | Ability to engage and interact with the audience | 10 |
| Encourages audience interaction through questions or active participation | ||
| Responds effectively to audience questions and comments | ||
| Critical Thinking & Analysis | Depth of analysis and reflection on the research topic | 15 |
| Demonstrates original thinking and critical engagement with the research | ||
| Identifies limitations or future directions for research | ||
| Professionalism | Overall, the professional quality of the presentation | 10 |
| Respect for time limits, prepared with material | ||
| Appropriate attire and a respectful manner |