Skip to content

Update SpannerIO.java - comment documentation#38492

Open
googledrew wants to merge 1 commit into
apache:masterfrom
googledrew:2026-05-13-spannerio-doc-update-mutations
Open

Update SpannerIO.java - comment documentation#38492
googledrew wants to merge 1 commit into
apache:masterfrom
googledrew:2026-05-13-spannerio-doc-update-mutations

Conversation

@googledrew
Copy link
Copy Markdown

Spanner supports 80,000 mutations per transacton

https://docs.cloud.google.com/spanner/quotas#limits_for_creating_reading_updating_and_deleting_data:~:text=Mutations%20per%20commit

Please add a meaningful description for your change here


Thank you for your contribution! Follow this checklist to help us incorporate your contribution quickly and easily:

  • Mention the appropriate issue in your description (for example: addresses #123), if applicable. This will automatically add a link to the pull request in the issue. If you would like the issue to automatically close on merging the pull request, comment fixes #<ISSUE NUMBER> instead.
  • Update CHANGES.md with noteworthy changes.
  • If this contribution is large, please file an Apache Individual Contributor License Agreement.

See the Contributor Guide for more tips on how to make review process smoother.

To check the build health, please visit https://github.com/apache/beam/blob/master/.test-infra/BUILD_STATUS.md

GitHub Actions Tests Status (on master branch)

Build python source distribution and wheels
Python tests
Java tests
Go tests

See CI.md for more information about GitHub Actions CI or the workflows README to see a list of phrases to trigger workflows.

@gemini-code-assist
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Summary of Changes

Hello, I'm Gemini Code Assist1! I'm currently reviewing this pull request and will post my feedback shortly. In the meantime, here's a summary to help you and other reviewers quickly get up to speed!

This pull request updates the documentation within SpannerIO.java to accurately reflect the current Cloud Spanner mutation limit per transaction, increasing the documented value from 20,000 to 80,000 to align with official Google Cloud documentation.

Highlights

  • Documentation Update: Updated the Javadoc in SpannerIO.java to reflect the correct mutation limit per transaction.
New Features

🧠 You can now enable Memory (public preview) to help Gemini Code Assist learn from your team's feedback. This makes future code reviews more consistent and personalized to your project's style. Click here to enable Memory in your admin console.

Using Gemini Code Assist

The full guide for Gemini Code Assist can be found on our documentation page, here are some quick tips.

Invoking Gemini

You can request assistance from Gemini at any point by creating a comment using either /gemini <command> or @gemini-code-assist <command>. Below is a summary of the supported commands on the current page.

Feature Command Description
Code Review /gemini review Performs a code review for the current pull request in its current state.
Pull Request Summary /gemini summary Provides a summary of the current pull request in its current state.
Comment @gemini-code-assist Responds in comments when explicitly tagged, both in pull request comments and review comments.
Help /gemini help Displays a list of available commands.

Customization

To customize the Gemini Code Assist for GitHub experience, repository maintainers can create a configuration file and/or provide a custom code review style guide (such as PEP-8 for Python) by creating and adding files to a .gemini/ folder in the base of the repository. Detailed instructions can be found here.

Limitations & Feedback

Gemini Code Assist may make mistakes. Please leave feedback on any instances where its feedback is incorrect or counterproductive. You can react with 👍 and 👎 on @gemini-code-assist comments. If you're interested in giving your feedback about your experience with Gemini Code Assist for GitHub and other Google products, sign up here.

Footnotes

  1. Review the Privacy Notices, Generative AI Prohibited Use Policy, Terms of Service, and learn how to configure Gemini Code Assist in GitHub here. Gemini can make mistakes, so double check it and use code with caution.

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@gemini-code-assist gemini-code-assist Bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Code Review

This pull request updates the Javadoc documentation in SpannerIO.java to reflect the increased Spanner transaction limit of 80,000 mutated cells. Feedback suggests that the DEFAULT_MAX_NUM_MUTATIONS constant should also be updated to match the documentation and recommends using 'number of mutations' instead of 'size' to prevent confusion with the 100MB commit size limit.

* <p>Note that the <a
* href="https://cloud.google.com/spanner/quotas#limits_for_creating_reading_updating_and_deleting_data">maximum
* size of a single transaction</a> is 20,000 mutated cells - including cells in indexes. If you
* size of a single transaction</a> is 80,000 mutated cells - including cells in indexes. If you
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

medium

The documentation update to 80,000 is correct, but the change is incomplete. The DEFAULT_MAX_NUM_MUTATIONS constant in this class should also be updated to 80,000 to ensure the default behavior matches the documentation. Additionally, consider using 'number of mutations' instead of 'size' to avoid confusion with the separate 100MB commit size limit. Finally, please update the PR description to remove the placeholder text and fix the typo ('transacton').

Suggested change
* size of a single transaction</a> is 80,000 mutated cells - including cells in indexes. If you
* number of mutations in a single transaction</a> is 80,000 mutations - including mutations in indexes. If you

@github-actions
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Assigning reviewers:

R: @chamikaramj for label java.
R: @nielm for label spanner.

Note: If you would like to opt out of this review, comment assign to next reviewer.

Available commands:

  • stop reviewer notifications - opt out of the automated review tooling
  • remind me after tests pass - tag the comment author after tests pass
  • waiting on author - shift the attention set back to the author (any comment or push by the author will return the attention set to the reviewers)

The PR bot will only process comments in the main thread (not review comments).

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant