Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[CALCITE-1962] Changes SqlOrderBy unparse method to use the SqlPrettyWriter.fetchOffset #525

Open
wants to merge 1 commit into
base: main
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

pauloriordan
Copy link

@pauloriordan pauloriordan commented Aug 23, 2017

Changes SqlOrderBy's unparse method to use the SqlPrettyWriter.fetchOffset which writes dialect specific fetch/offset/limit statements.

…et method, which correctly writes dialect specific offset/fetch/limit statements.
@pauloriordan pauloriordan changed the title [CALCITE-1962] Changes SqlOrderBy unparse method to use the fetchOffs… [CALCITE-1962] Changes SqlOrderBy unparse method to use the SqlPrettyWriter.fetchOffset Aug 23, 2017
@julianhyde
Copy link
Contributor

-1

See conversation at https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-1962.

@F21
Copy link
Member

F21 commented Jan 3, 2019

@julianhyde Do you still maintain a -1 for this PR? If so, can we close this?

@julianhyde
Copy link
Contributor

Let's discuss in the JIRA case.

@vlsi vlsi added returned-with-feedback There are review comments (in JIRA and/or in GitHub) to be implemented before merging the PR discussion-in-jira There's open discussion in JIRA to be resolved before proceeding with the PR labels Jan 7, 2019
@danny0405 danny0405 force-pushed the master branch 2 times, most recently from 80f411d to ca27fe9 Compare November 30, 2019 07:52
@vlsi vlsi force-pushed the master branch 2 times, most recently from 49cb002 to 8768a23 Compare December 29, 2019 12:07
@Lucaszlei
Copy link

What is the final conclusion of this question

@Lucaszlei
Copy link

@pauloriordan

@julianhyde
Copy link
Contributor

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
discussion-in-jira There's open discussion in JIRA to be resolved before proceeding with the PR returned-with-feedback There are review comments (in JIRA and/or in GitHub) to be implemented before merging the PR
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants