find vms regression fix #10647
find vms regression fix #10647
Conversation
|
@blueorangutan package |
| @@ -82,6 +82,49 @@ public VirtualMachineMO findVm(String vmName) throws Exception { | |||
| List<ObjectContent> ocs = getVmProperties(new String[] {"name", instanceNameCustomField}); | |||
| return HypervisorHostHelper.findVmFromObjectContent(_context, ocs.toArray(new ObjectContent[0]), vmName, instanceNameCustomField); | |||
| } | |||
| public VirtualMachineMO findVm2(String vmName) throws Exception { | |||
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Can we rename the findVm method to something similar to findVmThroughPropertiesEx and rename this findVm2 method to findVm? This way we can redirect all the existing usages of the method to it. Then we could invoke findVmThroughPropertiesEx to the listUnmanagedInstances execution
|
@blueorangutan package |
|
@DaanHoogland a [SL] Jenkins job has been kicked to build packages. It will be bundled with KVM, XenServer and VMware SystemVM templates. I'll keep you posted as I make progress. |
Codecov ReportAttention: Patch coverage is
Additional details and impacted files@@ Coverage Diff @@
## 4.19 #10647 +/- ##
==========================================
Coverage 15.16% 15.16%
- Complexity 11328 11333 +5
==========================================
Files 5415 5412 -3
Lines 474824 474997 +173
Branches 57912 57957 +45
==========================================
+ Hits 72014 72041 +27
- Misses 394757 394899 +142
- Partials 8053 8057 +4
Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more. ☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry. 🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
|
|
Packaging result [SF]: ✖️ el8 ✖️ el9 ✖️ debian ✖️ suse15. SL-JID 12977 |
|
@blueorangutan package |
|
@DaanHoogland a [SL] Jenkins job has been kicked to build packages. It will be bundled with KVM, XenServer and VMware SystemVM templates. I'll keep you posted as I make progress. |
|
Packaging result [SF]: ✔️ el8 ✔️ el9 ✔️ debian ✔️ suse15. SL-JID 12997 |
|
@blueorangutan test |
|
@DaanHoogland a [SL] Trillian-Jenkins test job (ol8 mgmt + kvm-ol8) has been kicked to run smoke tests |
…red VMs (apache#9925)" This reverts commit aa6c581.
DaanHoogland
force-pushed
the
ghi10634-findVmsFix
branch
from
90b38d5 to
b2f24d8
Compare
boring-cyborg
bot
added
component:api
component:integration-test
component:UI
Python
|
@blueorangutan package |
|
@nvazquez a [SL] Jenkins job has been kicked to build packages. It will be bundled with KVM, XenServer and VMware SystemVM templates. I'll keep you posted as I make progress. |
|
Packaging result [SF]: ✖️ el8 ✖️ el9 ✖️ debian ✖️ suse15. SL-JID 13048 |
|
@DaanHoogland it seems like there are some issues with the UI files, can you please check? |
|
[SF] Trillian test result (tid-12981)
|
|
@blueorangutan package |
|
@DaanHoogland a [SL] Jenkins job has been kicked to build packages. It will be bundled with KVM, XenServer and VMware SystemVM templates. I'll keep you posted as I make progress. |
|
Packaging result [SF]: ✔️ el8 ✔️ el9 ✔️ debian ✔️ suse15. SL-JID 13058 |
|
@blueorangutan test ol8 vmware-70u3 |
|
@DaanHoogland a [SL] Trillian-Jenkins test job (ol8 mgmt + vmware-70u3) has been kicked to run smoke tests |
| @@ -38,23 +36,19 @@ | |||
| import javax.xml.ws.handler.HandlerResolver; | |||
| import javax.xml.ws.handler.PortInfo; | |||
|
|
|||
|
|
|||
| if (response.listvmwaredcsresponse.vmwaredc && response.listvmwaredcsresponse.vmwaredc.length > 0) { | ||
| this.existingvcenter = response.listvmwaredcsresponse.vmwaredc | ||
| if (response.listvmwaredcsresponse.VMwareDC && response.listvmwaredcsresponse.VMwareDC.length > 0) { | ||
| this.existingvcenter = response.listvmwaredcsresponse.VMwareDC |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
@DaanHoogland seems this is the issue for vmware dc listing in zone
There was a problem hiding this comment.
That is in VmwareData.vue @sureshanaparti but this change is also needed import VMware feature.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
correct, @DaanHoogland check if the object name change is requried or not.
|
@harikrishna-patnala a Jenkins job has been kicked to build UI QA env. I'll keep you posted as I make progress. |
|
UI build: ✔️ |
| for (VmwareDatacenter vmwareDc : vmwareDcList) { | ||
| VmwareDatacenterResponse vmwareDcResponse = new VmwareDatacenterResponse(); | ||
|
|
||
| vmwareDcResponse.setId(vmwareDc.getUuid()); | ||
| vmwareDcResponse.setVcenter(vmwareDc.getVcenterHost()); | ||
| vmwareDcResponse.setName(vmwareDc.getVmwareDatacenterName()); | ||
| vmwareDcResponse.setZoneId(getZoneId()); | ||
| vmwareDcResponse.setObjectName(ApiConstants.VMWARE_DC); | ||
| vmwareDcResponse.setObjectName("VMwareDC"); |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
is this change needed? most of the object names used are in lower case.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
I agree @sureshanaparti , but this is a revert I can remove this part but than we need to add the code for https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/10731/files
|
[SF] Trillian test result (tid-13015)
|
|
@blueorangutan test ol8 vmware-70u3 |
|
@vladimirpetrov a [SL] Trillian-Jenkins test job (ol8 mgmt + vmware-70u3) has been kicked to run smoke tests |
|
[SF] Trillian Build Failed (tid-13042) |
DaanHoogland
requested review from
harikrishna-patnala,
nvazquez and
sureshanaparti
|
[SF] Trillian test result (tid-13054)
|
Description
This PR...
Fixes: #10634
Types of changes
Feature/Enhancement Scale or Bug Severity
Feature/Enhancement Scale
Bug Severity
Screenshots (if appropriate):
How Has This Been Tested?
How did you try to break this feature and the system with this change?